Re: [PanoToolsNG] Re: Lost Link to simple pano bracket
- On 31 Mar 2007, at 17:36, Roger Berry wrote:
> With a setup like this going on a pole, I would be more worried aboutYes, I've never really trusted 1/4" alu screws. Stainless or brass
> the small ¼ inch threads on the knob that hold the camera and bracket
> in place. A lot of them used in photography equipment are made out of
> aluminum. The ones that I use are stainless steel.
> Roger Berry
1/4", or for heavy stuff 3/8" brass for everything but table-tripods,
- This works quite well for me -
http://geekography.com/polepano/polepano-82mm.htm - although it is nearly
identical to those mentioned earlier - btw they've been powdercoated with a
black medium texture now. I recently found that although, although designed
for spherical panos with the Canon 350D and the Peleng 8mm, it works really
well for single-row panos (i.e. non-spherical) with the Canon 50mm f1.8 lens
that everybody loves, I haven't done much testing, but I was pleased with
my initial results.
On 3/31/07, Ian Wood <panolists@...> wrote:
> On 31 Mar 2007, at 17:36, Roger Berry wrote:
> > With a setup like this going on a pole, I would be more worried about
> > the small ¼ inch threads on the knob that hold the camera and bracket
> > in place. A lot of them used in photography equipment are made out of
> > aluminum. The ones that I use are stainless steel.
> > Roger Berry
> Yes, I've never really trusted 1/4" alu screws. Stainless or brass
> 1/4", or for heavy stuff 3/8" brass for everything but table-tripods,
> for me.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- Roger Berry schrieb:
> Is this what you're looking for?[...]
- Thanks for that information about climbing gear, nonethelesss I will
still try to be very careful with both my climbing and photography
equipment in the future :-)
I know the DAV magazine but only read it from time to time. I always
appreciated their technical discussions and tests about security issues.
So when constructing self made panorama brackets using aluminum from
"unknown" sources one should still take into account other possible ways
to minimize weight AND keep it both simple and safe. See my first self
made bracket on
where I used L shaped aluminum profiles. Aluminum is not a bad material.
And I know that bracket is not as elegant as other brackets I've seen,
it was just a prototype which worked very well for me for a long time.
Oh, and yes: I also try to use 3/8" instead of 1/4" wherever possible.
Posted by: "Erik Krause"
> Carl von Einem wrote:
>> > There is a reason that a freeclimber will exchange that part of his/her
>> > gear (made from aluminum) ASAP if dropped. Aluminum will get very fine
>> > cracks (fissures) and break some time later without a warning.
> Sorry, but this is a myth that has been refuted by the "DAV
> Sicherheitskreis" (german alpine club - safety section) several years
> ago. According to Pit Schubert this applies to climbing gear, because
> it constits of a special type of aluminium alloy. Cheap aluminium
> profiles will probably behave differently...
> However, stainless steel is far worse in this regard. Who ever
> climbed the "Boulder Highway" (Grimsel, Switzerland) in the late
> eighties knows what I'm talking about...
- On Monday, April 02, 2007 at 16:33, Carl von Einem wrote:
> So when constructing self made panorama brackets using aluminum fromYes, I know. However, material that can be bent in a home workshop
> "unknown" sources one should still take into account other possible ways
> to minimize weight AND keep it both simple and safe. See my first self
> made bracket on
> where I used L shaped aluminum profiles. Aluminum is not a bad material.
probably is not stiff enough for a pano bracket. That's why I was so
glad to discover the Item profiles with really good corner joints for
Copyright (c) 2007 Erik Krause
Verbatim copying and distribution strictly forbidden
except those allowed in wiki.panotools.org/User_Guidelines