Re: Good QTVR compresion ratio and pano size settings for 56 K modem visitors
- --- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, "dalileis" <qtvrbiro@...> wrote:
>Well my stats for Croatia only has 784 visitors for January but Dialup is much lower than
> The reason I inquired about this is that besides future clients in
> Sweden, I also have people interested in my panos in Croatia, and
> there are still some modem users there.
average, only 5,84%
In this case these 46 visitors had only 1,85 p/v and the ADSL had 2.76
Also, I've experienced people
> with broadband connection, that actually left the page in loading,Forget about this kind of visitors. They are not worth doing anything for as they have no
> because it did not load immediately, and I mean immediately. The pano
> was about 2 MB, and took about 3-4 secs to load, and they actually
> commented that: "It's opening kinda slow." To which I replied: "Well,
> it's not your usual image, this, you know."
interest in seeing anything.
> "Hey, if this 2 MB fullscreen pano, loading completely in under 4As I understand you use DevalVR you have the same advantage as for Quicktime.
> seconds on this broadband connection makes the client comment like
> that, then, what are the 56 kB users saying/thinking/doing?" when it's
> loading and loading and loading, and 10 seconds pass and it's still
> loading and loading... and the arrow on screen is geting ever closer
> that little x in the upper, right corner.
Loading tiles works very fast and you can see the image coming almost instantly even with
a 56K modem.
Its one of the most important features for a viewer and only DevalVR and Quicktime takes
the full advantages of it and loads exactly the same way.
> Seems there is a whole other psychological aspect to it, as it isThere is a lot of Cultural differences which make some countries more interested.
> surprising and a news to me the info you're bringing about the best
> visitors for panoramas.dk in many cases being dialup users, which
> actually look at more pages than others. Didn't expect that. Sounds
> excellent though, and I'll actually take freedom of quoting you on
> that in future. ;)
I am not just talking about language.
Lets say that some people are more curious than others.
- --- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, "Flemming V. Larsen" <fvl@...> wrote:
> I can agree with you to some point, but I don't think the visitors behaviorActually most visitors comes from Google and Yahoo and have no idea what they are
> at panoramas.dk can be used as a measure point.
> I guess most people visiting your pages know what they want and what they
> can expect to get - so they don't care for the waiting time.
> On other sites (like hotel-booking etc) the panoramas are just a small part,
> so the vistors has other purposes and may not be so patient.
The Google visitors who most arrive on searches like Mt Everest, Eiffel Tower, New Years
Eve or First man on the Moon have more pageviews per visitor ( in Jan 2.92% ) than the
Of course there is a lot of them leaving at once either beacuse of no Quicktime (30%) or
because they perhaps click on an Ad or just are not interested.
Usually about 50-65% leave the entry page if it is a fullscreen.
I have 30% leaving the Startpage without seeing anything else.
However if I can get just 10% of these visitors interested in seeing more and return I think
it is a success.
Whats wrong with the Hotel Tours is usually that they are hidden away both from Google
and the visitors who arrive on the main website.
The panorama tour should be an entry page like the startpage or any other page.
Webdesigners do not understand this.
Each panorama is a valuable ad which should be used just as an ad in Google or on
another site. Individually optimized they are very valuable.
- Honestly, I don't make a size particularly for modem users. Plus, it
is fairly subjective what parameters you push which way. You can
play with face size and compression; face size has the biggest impact
and I usually just adjust the size of the faces until I get the size
in MB I am targeting. If you have a movie you want to check for
download time, I would be happy to give it a run through deliVRator
for you 8-)
On Feb 1, 2007, at 3:28 AM, dalileis wrote:
> Hi, John, thanks for the tip. Sadly, we're on Windows, no Mac in site.
> If you have DeliVRator and use it for the described purposes of making
> panos aimed for modem users: could you jot down the settings you use
> real quick? ;)
> Best regards,
> --- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, John Riley <johnriley@...> wrote:
> > I don't know if you are on a Mac or not, but if you are deliVRator
> > can simulate downloading your pano at different speeds. You could
> > play with your setting to find what seems reasonable to you. It is
> > interesting to watch, since sometimes you have the order in which
> > tiles download screwed up by changing the initial view. A quick
> > optimization in deliVRator sets that straight too.
> > John
> > John Riley
> > johnriley@...
> > jriley@...
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
PTViewer can do that too, can't it?
Using ptv or ptvref files allows the tiles immediately in front of the
viewer to load first, regardless of where you set the initial view and also
dynamically changes if you shift your view before the entire pano is loaded.
Question regarding qtvr: Can one change the initial view of the qtvr and
have the facing tiles load first without having to repack the qtvr?
)From: Hans Nyberg
)--- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com
)<mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com> , "dalileis"
)As I understand you use DevalVR you have the same advantage as
)Loading tiles works very fast and you can see the image coming
)almost instantly even with a 56K modem.
)Its one of the most important features for a viewer and only
)DevalVR and Quicktime takes the full advantages of it and
)loads exactly the same way.
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.12/654 - Release Date: 27/01/2007