- ... ;-) ... It s a very good job it isn t more fragmented, eh? :-) ... I utterly, totally agree. Which is why I place my medium- and long-term bets on HTML5,Message 1 of 82 , Feb 11, 2013View SourceOn 11 Feb 2013, at 02:28, Trausti Hraunfjord <trausti.hraunfjord@...> wrote:
These things need support as widely as possible [[trimmed at this point]];-)
if things were fractioned even more... creating a need for 100 different panorama engines, 50 different browsers etcIt's a very good job it isn't more fragmented, eh? :-)
it should be clear to everyone that there is a need for ONE platform that works equally well on EVERY device. We can't have 5 completely different protocols for devices to access the internet, it won't serve the greater good to cut the net up in that way.I utterly, totally agree. Which is why I place my medium- and long-term bets on HTML5, an open, non-proprietary standard.I know these things take a long time, and it may not be something you're dealing with today, but I do look forward to the day when FPP includes this (maybe when it gets renamed PP?), or when FFC extends its reach to other engines. Best of luck dude! :-)k
- Hi, long and important discussion. With hacker skill into digital world we can do everything but i think that a pano-virtual tour would be published with aMessage 82 of 82 , May 20, 2013View SourceHi, long and important discussion. With hacker skill into digital world we
can do everything but i think that a pano-virtual tour would be published
with a mininum of protection to discourage the average user. So with Krpano
what's the best workflow with minimal protection?
View this message in context: http://panotoolsng.586017.n4.nabble.com/Html5-xml-and-image-encyrption-tp4656899p4657423.html
Sent from the PanoToolsNG mailing list archive at Nabble.com.