Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [PanoToolsNG] Re: Peleng Chromatic Aberration

Expand Messages
  • Roger D. Williams
    Thanks Erik. I did manage to fumble my way to saving all those TIFF files. I had often used the SAVE button, of course, but didn t realize that when you have
    Message 1 of 20 , Jan 11, 2013
    View Source
    • 0 Attachment
      Thanks Erik. I did manage to fumble my way to saving all those TIFF
      files. I had often used the SAVE button, of course, but didn't realize
      that when you have selected multiple files it will save them all. It
      was quite quick doing so, much quicker than doing it one by one.

      Incidentally, John Houghton kindly processed one of my DNG files with
      his CS6, and I was surprised to see that the CA removal is even more
      precise and effective. CS5 is quite good but CS6 is exceelent. At least
      on the file I sent John, it is.

      Roger

      On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:46:47 +0900, Erik Krause <erik.krause@...> wrote:

      > Am 11.01.2013 09:03, schrieb Roger D. Williams:
      >> how can I execute one command that will convert all the RAW files to
      >> TIFFs?
      >
      > In Bridge select all of your files, right click and choose "open in
      > ACR", in ACR select all, do your adjustment (you can save your
      > adjustments as a preset). Eventually adjust workflow options (bottom
      > middle link) then click Save Images in the bottom left corner.
      >
      > Instead of Bridge you can also select your files in Explorer or Finder
      > and drag them on an open photoshop window.
      >


      --
      Business: www.adex-japan.com
      Pleasure: www.usefilm.com/member/roger
      Panorama: Rogerama at photosynth.net
    • Ken Warner
      I like the general simplicity of mirrorless cameras. I don t need a viewfinder just a way to set the exposure and other parameters. And I like small and
      Message 2 of 20 , Jan 11, 2013
      View Source
      • 0 Attachment
        I like the general simplicity of mirrorless cameras. I don't need a viewfinder just a way to set the exposure and other parameters. And I like small and light and cheap. NEX is pretty good for all that except for the lack of proper bracketing and remote shutter activation. The K-01 is a serious candidate for my next camera. They are on eBay for less than $300 USD.

        I don't need a conversation starter. Once I was on a trail around a lake in the middle of shooting a pano and a guy stopped and insisted that I explain to him what I was doing and the best equipment to do it. He wouldn't leave even after I bluntly asked him to get out of the way. I would like a completely invisible rig.

        On 1/11/2013 3:49 AM, Roger D. Williams wrote:
        > On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:11:01 +0900, Ken Warner<kwarner000@...>
        > wrote:
        >
        >> Sony sensor. Same a s in the NEX cameras. The nice thing about the
        >> Pentax is that lenses are cheap(er) and the camera is more like a real
        >> camera than the NEX. And they are getting cheap.
        >
        > Another advantage of the K-01 is that the bright yellow rubber on mine
        > (the only colour available in the "outlet" deal I got, with the camera
        > in a box for the zoom-lens set but without the zoom, which they are
        > presumably selling separately) is a great conversation starter, even
        > before I attach my bright black and blue ring mount. My monopod with
        > its tiny tripod at the bottom to hold it in position while free to
        > rotate, also gets some raised eyebrows and the occasional comment. I
        > do enjoy these conversations.
        >
        > The K-30 is a really nice camera, and a grade or two up from my K-x.
        > And if they continue to drop in price at the same rate I will soon be
        > able to afford one!
        >
        > Roger
        >
      • Erik Krause
        ... Yes, that might be true. At least the fringes removal is enhanced as you can adjust the fringes colors and removal amount for two color ranges
        Message 3 of 20 , Jan 11, 2013
        View Source
        • 0 Attachment
          Am 11.01.2013 12:53, schrieb Roger D. Williams:
          > Incidentally, John Houghton kindly processed one of my DNG files with
          > his CS6, and I was surprised to see that the CA removal is even more
          > precise and effective. CS5 is quite good but CS6 is excellent. At least
          > on the file I sent John, it is.

          Yes, that might be true. At least the fringes removal is enhanced as you
          can adjust the fringes colors and removal amount for two color ranges
          individually. And ACR 7 features a better highlight recovery and a new
          process giving much nicer transitions to overexposed areas.

          You don't need CS6 to get ACR 7 BTW. Recent Lightroom contains the same
          raw conversion engine...

          --
          Erik Krause
          http://www.erik-krause.de
        • Roger D Williams
          Incidentally, Paint Shop Pro had two-colour adjustable width de-fringe options with eye-drop selection of the colours a decade ago! I am tempted by Lightroom,
          Message 4 of 20 , Jan 11, 2013
          View Source
          • 0 Attachment
            Incidentally, Paint Shop Pro had two-colour adjustable width de-fringe options with eye-drop selection of the colours a decade ago!

            I am tempted by Lightroom, but CS6 would be the last PS I could upgrade to under the new Adobe rules, and there are other things I like and want to try in CS6, so now I know it does a better job in this important area I have decided to go for it.

            Roger W

            Sent from my iPad

            On Jan 11, 2013, at 10:55 PM, Erik Krause <erik.krause@...> wrote:

            > Am 11.01.2013 12:53, schrieb Roger D. Williams:
            >> Incidentally, John Houghton kindly processed one of my DNG files with
            >> his CS6, and I was surprised to see that the CA removal is even more
            >> precise and effective. CS5 is quite good but CS6 is excellent. At least
            >> on the file I sent John, it is.
            >
            > Yes, that might be true. At least the fringes removal is enhanced as you
            > can adjust the fringes colors and removal amount for two color ranges
            > individually. And ACR 7 features a better highlight recovery and a new
            > process giving much nicer transitions to overexposed areas.
            >
            > You don't need CS6 to get ACR 7 BTW. Recent Lightroom contains the same
            > raw conversion engine...
            >
            > --
            > Erik Krause
            > http://www.erik-krause.de
            >
            >
            > ------------------------------------
            >
            > --
            >
            >
            >
          • Briar
            I only had CS2 so jumped into Creative Cloud membership...CS6 plus a raft of other software, including immediate updates for $50 per month. It would take me
            Message 5 of 20 , Jan 11, 2013
            View Source
            • 0 Attachment

              I only had CS2 so jumped into Creative Cloud membership…..CS6 plus a raft of other software, including immediate updates for $50 per month. It would take me three years just to pay for CS6 at that rate.

              May be worth considering?

               

              From: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com [mailto:PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Roger D Williams
              Sent: Saturday, 12 January 2013 1:18 p.m.
              To: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com
              Subject: Re: [PanoToolsNG] Re: Peleng Chromatic Aberration

               

               

              Incidentally, Paint Shop Pro had two-colour adjustable width de-fringe options with eye-drop selection of the colours a decade ago!

              I am tempted by Lightroom, but CS6 would be the last PS I could upgrade to under the new Adobe rules, and there are other things I like and want to try in CS6, so now I know it does a better job in this important area I have decided to go for it.

              Roger W

              Sent from my iPad

              On Jan 11, 2013, at 10:55 PM, Erik Krause erik.krause@...> wrote:

              > Am 11.01.2013 12:53, schrieb Roger D. Williams:
              >> Incidentally, John Houghton kindly processed one of my DNG files with
              >> his CS6, and I was surprised to see that the CA removal is even more
              >> precise and effective. CS5 is quite good but CS6 is excellent. At least
              >> on the file I sent John, it is.
              >
              > Yes, that might be true. At least the fringes removal is enhanced as you
              > can adjust the fringes colors and removal amount for two color ranges
              > individually. And ACR 7 features a better highlight recovery and a new
              > process giving much nicer transitions to overexposed areas.
              >
              > You don't need CS6 to get ACR 7 BTW. Recent Lightroom contains the same
              > raw conversion engine...
              >
              > --
              > Erik Krause
              > http://www.erik-krause.de
              >
              >
              > ------------------------------------
              >
              > --
              >
              >
              >

            • Roger D Williams
              I agree. Who needs ignorant old farts who think you owe them an explanation? I was thinking more of attractive young women who talk to me out of interest in my
              Message 6 of 20 , Jan 11, 2013
              View Source
              • 0 Attachment
                I agree. Who needs ignorant old farts who think you owe them an explanation? I was thinking more of attractive young women who talk to me out of interest in my unusual equipment although they would normally ignore me as just another old fart. <grin>

                Your experience may differ. For whatever reason... I mean I don't know how old you are. You could be getting all the attention you need or want.

                I have really tried to like the NEX series but just can't. At less than $300 I would buy a second and use the pair for stereo photos. Incredible value! (Currently I use a Fujifilm W3.)

                Sent from my iPad

                On Jan 11, 2013, at 9:04 PM, Ken Warner <kwarner000@...> wrote:

                > I like the general simplicity of mirrorless cameras. I don't need a viewfinder just a way to set the exposure and other parameters. And I like small and light and cheap. NEX is pretty good for all that except for the lack of proper bracketing and remote shutter activation. The K-01 is a serious candidate for my next camera. They are on eBay for less than $300 USD.
                >
                > I don't need a conversation starter. Once I was on a trail around a lake in the middle of shooting a pano and a guy stopped and insisted that I explain to him what I was doing and the best equipment to do it. He wouldn't leave even after I bluntly asked him to get out of the way. I would like a completely invisible rig.
                >
                > On 1/11/2013 3:49 AM, Roger D. Williams wrote:
                >> On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:11:01 +0900, Ken Warner<kwarner000@...>
                >> wrote:
                >>
                >>> Sony sensor. Same a s in the NEX cameras. The nice thing about the
                >>> Pentax is that lenses are cheap(er) and the camera is more like a real
                >>> camera than the NEX. And they are getting cheap.
                >>
                >> Another advantage of the K-01 is that the bright yellow rubber on mine
                >> (the only colour available in the "outlet" deal I got, with the camera
                >> in a box for the zoom-lens set but without the zoom, which they are
                >> presumably selling separately) is a great conversation starter, even
                >> before I attach my bright black and blue ring mount. My monopod with
                >> its tiny tripod at the bottom to hold it in position while free to
                >> rotate, also gets some raised eyebrows and the occasional comment. I
                >> do enjoy these conversations.
                >>
                >> The K-30 is a really nice camera, and a grade or two up from my K-x.
                >> And if they continue to drop in price at the same rate I will soon be
                >> able to afford one!
                >>
                >> Roger
                >
                >
                > ------------------------------------
                >
                > --
                >
                >
                >
              • Ken Warner
                Well, there s that... On 1/11/2013 6:18 PM, Roger D Williams wrote: I was thinking more of attractive young women who talk to me out of interest in my unusual
                Message 7 of 20 , Jan 11, 2013
                View Source
                • 0 Attachment
                  Well, there's that...

                  On 1/11/2013 6:18 PM, Roger D Williams wrote:
                  I was thinking more of attractive young women who talk to me out of interest in my unusual equipment although they would normally ignore me as just another old fart.<grin>
                  >
                Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.