Re: 360precision atome in google streetview
- Again I think I should clarify what I said. I have nothing against perfectionists, and their perfect panos :-) it would take a rather insane reading of my message to come to that understanding.
What I find to be terribly, tragically counterproductive for yourself and for your art, the medium of pano photography, is:
to be a perfectionist, and to react dismissively or with real hatred, at the sight of panoramas that don't live up to your standard. I love all panos, even ones that have soul and maybe a few stitching errors also. Does that mean that I don't appreciate truly perfect ones too? Of course not.
I'm truly saddened to see the removal of ignacio's panos from 360cities, and I hope to see them back someday. The fact that it's coming from a misunderstanding is the real tragedy here. Maybe I should have made myself more clear. I hope now that I have done so.
Hans, you will live 1000 years and still say that Google doesn't make anything panoramic, :-)) And you still didn't respond to my challenge for a boxing match to settle our differences.
Robert, would you kindly respond to my invitation to meet while I'm in Chicago, or otherwise, stop insulting me on the internet!? :-))
- Thank you, Eduardo. I'm glad to see there still seem to be people who understand what an open discussion means. I simply don't get why people can't live with other peoples opinions, even not, when they take their time and explain their motivation in detail.
Using killerphrases (if at all) is not the way to cultivate a discussion where people could benefit from.
--- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, Eduardo Hutter <montreal360@...> wrote:
> I'm sorry, but this is a "discussion list". Discussion. And as such,
> nothing more than discussions and exchange of information should be
> expected, and that's precisely the goal of the list. Of course, 360Cities
> being such a big player on the subject covered here, it will at some point
> get into the *discussions*.
> This is not trolling, it's a discussion. Not sharing the same point of
> view, and strongly defending them , is not trolling. Even treating others
> personal POVs with disdain and saying they cannot be reasoned with- no
> matter the logic behind it, and no matter how much I disagree with that
> kind of atittude, but hey, this isn't news -is not trolling.
> Of course, personal attacks dont fit in this category and should be taken
> elsewhere. But even then, personal attacks are not necessarely trolling.
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 8:40 AM, zen.alien <zenalien@...>wrote:
> > **
> > Hi Jeffrey...
> > may I suggest to remember the rule #14 of the internet ?
> > - Do not argue with trolls - It means that they win.