Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: Beamsplitters for anaglyphs?

Expand Messages
  • jrgen_schrader
    Poor mans solution sounds good ^^ and of course you are right regarding the NPP. I wouldn t mind the resolution but when it comes to stitching of multirow
    Message 1 of 3 , Sep 17, 2011
    View Source
    • 0 Attachment
      Poor mans solution sounds good ^^ and of course you are right regarding the NPP. I wouldn't mind the resolution but when it comes to stitching of multirow stereo pairs I guess I'll quit, hehe.



      --- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, Erik Krause <erik.krause@...> wrote:
      >
      > Am 17.09.2011 15:47, schrieb jrgen_schrader:
      > > But wouldn't there be an advantage in registering the pairs or even
      > > in keeping the NPP?
      >
      > I don't think. Since the NPP location is the center of the apparent
      > position of the entrance pupil you still get two separated NPPs. Or to
      > put it the other way round: If you don't have two separated NPPs you
      > don't get a stereo image. It's only the parallax which makes it stereo.
      >
      > The other drawbacks, namely limited field of view and reduced resolution
      > makes them what they where actually meant: The poor man's solution to
      > take stereo photos. This was a bit different in analog times when there
      > where special stereo viewers for the slides produced.
      >
      > --
      > Erik Krause
      > http://www.erik-krause.de
      >
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.