Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [PanoToolsNG] Re: A few stitching errors ..

Expand Messages
  • Bjørn K Nilssen
    ... What if he sprayed a white paint on the backside of each strip to make it opaque? Wouldn t it be like printing with ink on a white paper? Or would the
    Message 1 of 16 , Aug 27, 2011
    • 0 Attachment
      På Sat, 27 Aug 2011 19:48:23 +0200, skrev Erik Krause <erik.krause@...>:

      > Am 27.08.2011 14:31, schrieb Will:
      >> I think it is 16mm film of two different iso ratings interwoven and
      >> perhaps sandwiched between glass in a 8x10 format (15 images wide x
      >> 16mm = 240mm or 10 inches). Or the film could be interwoven, exposed
      >> and the warp and the woof developed separately but I think it was all
      >> processed together. Note discoloration at the edges where the strips
      >> meet.
      >
      > It seems to be 16mm film indeed. Compare the sprocket holes:
      > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:16mmBWrevDP.png
      >
      > It should be possible to identify the film by the numbers printed along
      > the sides. I could read J72, but didn't find that f.e. on
      > http://www.paulivester.com/films/filmstock/guide.htm
      >
      > Still no idea how he got the film nontransparent (you can see through
      > the sprocket holes)...

      What if he sprayed a white paint on the backside of each strip to make it opaque?
      Wouldn't it be like printing with ink on a white paper?
      Or would the positive film require light behind it?


      --
      Bjørn K Nilssen - http://bknilssen.no - 3D and panoramas.
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.