Re: [PanoToolsNG] Re: A few stitching errors ..
- Yes, I saw the link on the previous post; I was wrong :-) . The effect
is very cool!! But, when inverted, the holes that were very clear
would become black.
2011/8/27 Erik Krause <erik.krause@...>:
> Am 27.08.2011 20:02, schrieb Rodolpho Pajuaba:--
>> If he didn't do it digitally (very unlikely) it's just a matter of
>> putting the mesh of 16mm negatives over a light table and shoot. After
>> inverted that's (kind of) what you can get.
> Negatives are transparent. You would see through...
> He writes: "I use positive 16mm movie film that I cut and load in a
> large format camera."
> -> http://www.parisbeijingphotogallery.com/main/seunghoonparkworks.asp
Follow me on Twitter - @rpajuaba
- På Sat, 27 Aug 2011 19:48:23 +0200, skrev Erik Krause <erik.krause@...>:
> Am 27.08.2011 14:31, schrieb Will:What if he sprayed a white paint on the backside of each strip to make it opaque?
>> I think it is 16mm film of two different iso ratings interwoven and
>> perhaps sandwiched between glass in a 8x10 format (15 images wide x
>> 16mm = 240mm or 10 inches). Or the film could be interwoven, exposed
>> and the warp and the woof developed separately but I think it was all
>> processed together. Note discoloration at the edges where the strips
> It seems to be 16mm film indeed. Compare the sprocket holes:
> It should be possible to identify the film by the numbers printed along
> the sides. I could read J72, but didn't find that f.e. on
> Still no idea how he got the film nontransparent (you can see through
> the sprocket holes)...
Wouldn't it be like printing with ink on a white paper?
Or would the positive film require light behind it?
Bjørn K Nilssen - http://bknilssen.no - 3D and panoramas.