Re: [PanoToolsNG] Re: Future of VR Panoramas - WAS: Apple dropped QTVR > VRP
- På Tue, 01 Feb 2011 11:29:47 +0100, skrev Bostjan Burger <si_lander@...>:
> I don't oppose to the term Interactive panorama but I have a second thoughtAfter all your 10y old Kranjska-gora pano is 360degrees as well as interactive.
> about it. Interactive panorama can be a flat panorama which is only scrolling
> left-right without the projection which gives the 'reality experience'. Here is
> the example which I don't say it gives a virtual reality experience and is not a
> Virtual Reality panorama, but it is only scrolling left-right interactive 360°
> . It is my 10 years old one and I used one of the very first flash 360°
> panoramas presentations in that time. This example was an exception as I used
> java and quick time ten years ago. (funny that that ski-centre still keeps that
> ten years old interactive panoramas on their web site even are oboslete and I
> suggested them to replace with the new virtual reality ones.
> Nowadays we don’t produce only interactive panoramas but the virtual reality
> panoramas which are visual projections of reality images, taken with camera or
> images taken from rendering from digital models of relief, on our screens which
> are displayed as a virtual reality images – panoramas or objects.
I guess such "panoramas" as this one could use the term "interactive panorama" as well? ;) :
I have a problem with "virtual reality" for a single photo 360panorama, as it is it not really virtual.
While a 360panorama made in 3D (which I made long before (96/97? with QTVR & IBM hotmedia) starting to
photograph them 5 years ago) is actually a real "virtual reality" image.
OTOH a VR tour is a virtual tour both made with photos and in 3D, as it is the tour that
is the virtual part, and not the images themselves?
How about "interactive 360"?
Or "interactive 360 panorama"
Or maybe i360? Or if Apple have patented that small "i", make it I360 ? ;)
IVR, IVR-360, VRI, VRI-360, iPano?
> :) Boštjan--
> From: Bjørn K Nilssen <bk@...>
> To: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tue, February 1, 2011 10:47:37 AM
> Subject: Re: [PanoToolsNG] Re: Future of VR Panoramas - WAS: Apple dropped QTVR
>I like the "Immersive image" (or panorama) a lot, but the problem is that I
> need to translate it to Norwegian, which is not easily done. I even contacted
> Norwegian language council (Språkrådet) a few years ago to see if thy could come
> with a good translation. Unfortunately none of their suggestions were any good.
> Virtual Reality would be "Virtuell Virkelighet" in Norwegian, which isn't quite
> the same.
> The English term is used more often here than the Norwegian variant.
> "Interactive panorama" is a fairly international/universal term I guess, and it
> describes the "product" quite well, as opposed to "normal" static panoramas? But
> opposed to VR the short form IP would not be useable.
> I currently mostly use "interactive panorama" or "interactive 360-panorama", and
> "interactive VR tour" for tours or "interactive net exhibition" for interactive
> ehibitions with lots of interactivity/hotspots. And "spherical panoramas"
> (kule-panorama in Norwegian)
> It would really be nice with an "official" international term :)
> So far my vote goes to "interactive panorama".
Bjørn K Nilssen - http://bknilssen.no - 3D and panoramas.
- My opinion is that we need to be exact with the use of terms. We know many types
of panoramas from the geographical point of view, as social, economic, cultural
panoramas. My daughters study music so they are familiar with musical panoramas…
I am working with the physical geography and GIS and panorama means for me a
visual perception of a landscape or a region. It is true; term panorama became
popular when geographers started with crocs which represented the surrounding
landscapes, often with 360°. That sketches were named panorama. Panorama is
truly worldwide expression and recognizable in most of the modern languages.
From that point of view I have no problem with using that term even in small
rooms (even not logical in some cases of use…). So… panorama (not a vista as
insitu view) is a flat 2D picture, photography of the landscape (urban or rural)
or »other« scapes. Interactive panorama is something what we can move or is with
hotspots. That what we do is the presentation of that flat 2D: paint, image,
sketch, photography which represents panorama, on the screen. That presentation
is with the projection algorithm which makes a mental illusion of the
surrounding image like to be there. If someone say 360° panorama I can't be
sure: is that a print or screen projection? Same is with interactive panorama –
is it only interactive picture or is the illusion of the surrounding? With term
Spherical panorama is same…is it a print, projection? What about cylinders?
(Most of my panoramas from mountain tops are cylinders).
But all is with the agreement and the consensuns with the use of terms. Let’s
use something what is already recognizable but be exact: flat is flat and
projection is a projection… Last decade I used term 360° panorama for a flat
image like prints and Virtual Reality panorama for a projection of that same
image on the screen.
From: Don Bain <dbain@...>
Sent: Sat, February 5, 2011 3:52:33 AM
Subject: Re: [PanoToolsNG] Re: Future of VR Panoramas - WAS: Apple dropped QTVR
> VRPIP is in use - it stands for Internet Protocol, as well as Intellectual
I use pano all the time also, but only when conversing with someone already
familiar with the concept.
Virtual Tour is also in use - follow a few links and you will find mostly
collections of still images, only a few VR panoramas.
To me, it isn't a tour unless it is linked nodes, with hotspots or a
floorplan/map. How can it be a tour if it is just from one place?
VR panorama, 360 panorama, interactive panorama - they all work.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]