Re: [PanoToolsNG] Going to Kuwait? Be prepared
- Woops. Imagine journalists needing to check primary sources. Might be a good idea, eh? If "journalists" did that then we wouldn't have had all the idiots spewing the ridiculous stuff about Obama's trip to Asia costing $200 million a day, having 34 naval warships diverted to support his trip (that's 10% of the fleet!), and that they would be booking 500 rooms in a 5-star hotel for 5000 people in his entourage (and not just any hotel, but the Taj Mahal that suffered the terrorist attacks in 2008!) That was apparently based on an unconfirmed story from an Indian news agency quoting an anonymous regional official. No one tried to confirm it with the White House before spouting it on national news and radio, despite it not even passing the laugh test. Hell, that is more per day than the freaking war in Afghanistan!
Journalism is either dead or on life-support. I think some of our media sources would excitedly and loudly repeat an anonymous story that Obama eats babies for breakfast.
On Nov 27, 2010, at 3:41 PM, michael crane wrote:
> On 24 November 2010 13:28, Hans <hans@...> wrote:
> > If you are going to Kuwait do not expect to do panoramas.
> > Or get yourself an Olympus Pen or smaller.
> > http://www.kuwaittimes.net/read_news.php?newsid=MzAwMTg4ODg1
> so that's retracted then ?
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- Please *read completely* before you reply! This is serious.
Am 04.12.2010 07:15, schrieb AYRTON:
> do you all know, that our Keith has left the List ????Yes, it's a real shame! And I feel especially ashamed as a moderator of
> This is BAD !!!
> Why waste time discussing things that are not directly related to
> and ... insulting others just because some people think they're funny, very
> f... funny
> This really makes me very mad !
> SHAME ! ! !
that list because I missed that discussion and got notified only via the
moderators list where some people complained (which is the right way to
deal with such incidents). Although it is in the footer of each message
here again the address of the moderators list:
Please bookmark it and use it if someone offends you. Please don't try
for yourself to argue with the offender.
As a result of this incident we (the moderators) currently discuss to
put offending members more easily on moderation for a limited period.
This means, that each message they post needs to be approved by a
moderator - not as a punishment but as a means to protect the list.
We don't like this instrument very much, not only because it increases
the workload but because it might cause fear to post something wrong.
Therefore we would like to call on anyone to think twice before he or
she posts something that might be offending to others. Especially
discrediting whole groups generally, be it profession, belief or
anything else, should not be posted here - even if you think this should
be common sense.
Pleas observe the user guidelines as outlined on
The general netiquette rules also apply:
I urge anyone to read those resources carefully!
Please note that any discussion about user guidelines, moderator duties,
list policy etc. is *off topic* here and will not be allowed.
Panotools-List@yahoogroups.com was created especially for those
discussions. Feel free to join on