Re: [PanoToolsNG] Re: 4/3 camera and new panasonic 8mm fisheye pano samples?
- På Thu, 04 Nov 2010 14:14:53 +0100, skrev Hans <hans@...>:
>Very nice :)
> --- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, Bjørn K Nilssen <bk@...> wrote:
>> På Thu, 04 Nov 2010 13:56:07 +0100, skrev Luca Vascon <vascon@...>:
>> > the cheapest....
>> I hope you meant cheap as "low-priced", and not quality-wise?
>> It looks very tempting, small, light and pretty "cheap" :)
>> Any reviews/tests worth reading?
>> I will most likely switch to the m4/3 system soon too.
> Bradford has some nice panos online.
Thanks a lot!
No need to stay away from m4/3 apparently :)
Bjørn K Nilssen - http://bknilssen.no - 3D and panoramas.
- An interesting capability of the Panasonic GH2 is its 40 fps 4k jpg 1 sec burst capacity
.. GH2 has a highest shutter speed of 1/4000 and this might be just fast enough to shoot 360s with a 1 sec continuous rotation device. If you could sync two GH2s in this mode (electronic shutter -- not mechanical -- but with lots of rolling shutter distortion apparently) with 2 8mms say - gives you 360 stereo panoramas in one second.
--- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, Fulvio Senore <mailing@...> wrote:
> Il 19/01/2011 16.56, John Riley ha scritto:
> > On Jan 19, 2011, at 3:07 AM, Wim Koornneef wrote:
> >> Thanks for sharing, I looked at the first and the last image and I am
> >> suprised to see that there is hardly any CA visible.
> > I am guessing that there must be in-camera CA correction. I wonder if the corrections are being shared with Olympus?
> Yes, micro four-thirds cameras have automatic correction. This is part
> of the format "philosophy".
> It is applied in-camera for jpegs and by most raw processors for raw images.
> AFAIK Panasonic corrects distortion, vignetting and CA.
> It seems to me that panasonic lenses will not have CA correction with
> Olympus bodies, but I am not sure. I read something about it some time
> ago and I am not sure that I remember it correctly.
> Fulvio Senore