Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [PanoToolsNG] Re: Some thoughts on "psuedo" HDR from RAW files

Expand Messages
  • Christian Bloch
    I was just about to say that. Going from a single RAW directly to HDR or tonemapping is not only easier, but also cleaner. Blochi ... [Non-text portions of
    Message 1 of 6 , Oct 8, 2010
    • 0 Attachment
      I was just about to say that. Going from a single RAW directly to HDR or tonemapping is not only easier, but also cleaner.

      Blochi

      On Oct 8, 2010, at 4:15 AM, Erik Krause wrote:

      > In my opinion extracting three or more "exposures" from a RAW file is
      > far to tedious compared to the result. It is much easier to extract the
      > full dynamic range to a single 16 bit TIFF which by far is enough to
      > capture the complete dynamic and tonal range of a RAW image. You get a
      > washed looking image this way, but you can use tone mapping approaches,
      > simple high radius USM or even exposure fusion (with PTGui pro or tufuse
      > pro)



      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.