Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: Canon 16-35mm at 35mm

Expand Messages
  • jrgen_schrader
    Well, I don t have absolute numbers, but I can say that it s in the front quarter of the lens.
    Message 1 of 12 , Sep 30, 2010
    • 0 Attachment
      Well, I don't have absolute numbers, but I can say that it's in the front quarter of the lens.

      --- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, Isaac Garcia <coletassoft@...> wrote:
      > What're the NPP measurements for the Zeiss? I'm curious to know how they
      > compare to the 16-35 (one being a zoom an the other a prime).
      > Cheers.
      > Sent from HTC Hero. Please excuse typos.
      > On Sep 30, 2010 7:40 AM, "jrgen_schrader" <panorama@...> wrote:
      > I do a lot of sphericals with 35mm and the best lens so far is my old Zeiss
      > Distagon 35/2,8 which you can get pretty cheap on ebay.
      > I shoot 3 rows of 12 +z +n. The horizontal overlap is quite enough because
      > there is little vignetting. Only with the zenith shot I sometimes get a
      > visible seem in blue skies which can be a pain to retouch. But I am always
      > to lazy to shoot more images ;)
      > I should try to take one of those indoors, the level of detail is amazing
      > and the DOF could be enough to get everything sharp on normal tripod heights
      > without stacking.
      > Cheers
      > J├╝rgen
      > --- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, Bostjan Burger <si_lander@> wrote: >
      > > Andrew, it is a goo...
      > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.