AW: [PanoToolsNG] Re: New Topaz De-Noise
- How about Imagenomic Noiseware ?
It does not "iron" the image as Noise Ninja does, keeps much more details
and a very good noise reduction.
70 USD is not that cheap, Noise Ninja is 35 USD but TOPAZ is about the same
But there is a difference in the pixel depth then.
360° VR Fotografie:
NEU: Abstrakte Fotografie unter:
Aktuelles vom Virtugrafen:
Von: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com [mailto:PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com]Im
Auftrag von 1drey
Gesendet: Freitag, 7. Mai 2010 06:54
Betreff: [PanoToolsNG] Re: New Topaz De-Noise
It works great, I agree!
The only drawback - it is much slower than Noise Ninja.
--- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, "Roger D. Williams" <roger@...> wrote:
> I have less need for noise reduction now that I have a Pentax K-x,
> but I have been impressed with the latest version of Topaz software's
> De-Noise plugin. It is on special offer until the end of this month,
> and seems to be well worth the discounted price (app. US$50). I have
> tried quite a few noise-reduction programs, and usually decided that
> I preferred the noisy image to the processed one, but Topaz has
> changed my mind. It leaves details unchanged, keeps edges sharp, and
> removes grain/noise from smooth plane surfaces where it is most
> I am thinking it could rejuvenate my early panoramas taken on film,
> many of which suffered from obvious grain (I used 400 and 800 ASA
> emulsions). <y first DSLR, the D200, also had too much noise for my
> taste at ISO-equivalent speeds over 400, so I'll be revisiting some
> of my D200 panoramas.
> Try it, you may like it.
> Roger W.
> Business: www.adex-japan.com
> Pleasure: www.usefilm.com/member/roger
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]