Re: [PanoToolsNG] Announcement: PTStitcherNG0.4b
- Keith Martin-2 wrote:
> Hmm. Didn't this go to an appropriate thread there? :-)
Indeed I made a mistake, I was answering your message thinking it came from
the PTGui forum.
Anyway, when you shoot your cropped fish eye images in portrait mode then
the first value of the C param is always negative. When you manually set the
first value of the C param to "0"(zero) and the second value to the image
width then the problem is gone.
BTW, my own test images are shot in landscape mode and the images are
rotated by the script.
In my case the negative value is the third of the C param and in this
position it seems to be that a negative value is no problem.
Hope this helps,
View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/Announcement-PTStitcherNG0-4b-tp991368p991934.html
Sent from the PanoToolsNG mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- I am a new Hugin User and I have encountered a vexing problem.
I have a six sequence set of long distance pictures taken in Alaska of the Wrangel-St Elias National Park. When I use CS3 to stitch the result is fairly pleasing (color and exposure wise).
However, when I used Hugin and select optimize "Exposure", the "Blend" across the sequence is weird. The anchor pic (pic 1) is VERY much lighter than the other five and there is a obvious blend seam. The exposure for pictures 2 thru 6 are uniform (somewhat dark, but uniform). The exposure for pic 1 is pleasing but is much brighter than the other five.