Re: [PanoToolsNG] The shape of cameras to come...
- On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 6:16 AM, Keith Martin <keith@...> wrote:
>I think DSC (digital still camera) is the most apt description (except
> >The G1 and GH1 are dslr's. They just don't have a mirror.
> SLR = single lens reflex. (Or self-loading rifle, but that'd be a
> different mailing list entirely...)
> Assuming the mirror action is where the 'reflex' part of the name
> comes from, would a mirrorless 'SLR' really qualify as a reflex
> camera? Or would it be a dSL instead?
that some of them do motion, yar). Other digital camera subsystems use
the terminology "TTL" or "through the lens", which might be a
reasonable way to talk about a camera with an active electronic
Personally, I'm looking forward to the day when we drop "digital" from
the abbreviation entirely. By now, digital must be eclipsing film in
numeric terms, and I think we'll soon reach the point where it's more
important to call something a "film camera" because we'll all
understand that most cameras are digital and expect photographs to be
taken with digital sensors. After all, we don't call cars "horseless
- So maybe you met my father Mario Vascon somewhere in CERN, in the
accelerator in Geneve, between 70ies or 80ies....??? Depending on how
old are you!
2009/11/3 luca vascon <luca.vascon@...>:
> 2009/11/3 John Riley <johnriley@...>:
>> Not now; I did my graduate work there. I did get romantically
>> involved with an italian woman one at a NATO nuclear physics summer
>> school in the Netherlands. They are definitely different from our
>> home-grown variety (in some very good ways!)
>> John Riley
>> On Nov 3, 2009, at 2:47 AM, luca vascon wrote:
>>> Are you at Duke?!
>>> Do you know a very attractive italian friend of mine who is teaching
>>> there?! I think italian arts and architecture...
>>> It is impossible not to notice her ;-)
>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> Luca Vascon.