RE: [PanoToolsNG] Re: Pano Processing Order
- I have never used the enfuse, I am downloading the Enfuse GUI now, thanks.
From: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com [mailto:PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Hans Nyberg
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 8:23 PM
Subject: [PanoToolsNG] Re: Pano Processing Order
--- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com> ,
"Hakan Durgut" <hakan.durgut@...> wrote:
> OK, so I am trying to stitch tonemapped images right now, I already had
> HDRSoft's Photomatix, but I've just downloaded and evaluating "Dynamic
> HDR" . I've created "eye catcher" HDRs of each set ( 1 zenith + 6 aroundto
> shot and one handheld nadir ).
> One thing though, once I create a HDR of one set bracketed images, I want
> be able to use the same settings for the other sets, and start a batchI do not think Tonemapping is optional for processing individual images.
> tonemap process, I wonder what you guys use for that ?
They might be more difficult to process without getting to much difference
Enfuse is so much easier to work with for getting a natural look.
>[mailto:PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com> ]
> From: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>
> Behalf Of Hans Nyberg<mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 2:15 PM
> To: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: [PanoToolsNG] Re: Pano Processing Order
> --- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>
> "Hakan Durgut" <hakan.durgut@> wrote:processing
> > Hi All,
> > Everybody must have a different combination of processes in pano
> processing. when it comes to HDR panos, I have some difficulties
> the 2:1complete
> > if I load my bracketed images to PTGui, it would take forever to
> the pano , with 3 bracketed images, I do not understand why PTGui is stilland
> trying to stitch image 0 and 1 or 1 and 2, instead of "0 and 3", anyway.
> What you see PTGui doing is not "stitching" but warping the images.
> PTgui needs to warp every single image in your setup and the time for each
> of them depends on your processor speed, size of image, number of cores
> the amount of Ram you have.by
> It can take just a couple of seconds or it can take minutes on a slow
> > I also tried to stitch all bracketed sets in a different ptgui session,
> using saving as template, and applying the same template to other sets.then
> HDR the 2:1s, I also want to tonemap the shots before processing 2:1s.only
> > I've heard that some ppl tonemap the bracketed sets on lightroom right
> before exporting..
> Personally I enfuse my bracketed sets first unless they are not aligned.
> PTgui is much faster to align all images with controlpoints than my Enfuse
> GUI (Bracketeer for Mac) is.
> Enfusing 3sets bracketed images + stitching the enfused images takes me
> half the time of stitching and fusing all images in PTGui.images
> Also I have much better control of the enfusing and can do individual
> enfusing if needed.
> For example I just did one panorama for which I only enfused 2 of the
> taken with the sun in the image.[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> To do this you have to control the enfusing with a visible preview and
> adjust it to match the rest of the images for the panorama.
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]