Re: [PanoToolsNG] Buying or not? 360 degree one-shot camera for 1100 USD
- Jan Martin wrote:
> Congratulations Jim!Thank you.
> Seems you managed to do what Bill Meikle over atYes I have been following Bills creations and adventures for a long time.
> gave up on.
> I would have gone for circuit board cameras with a proper lensYes my next version might be that. Inexpensive was the current plan.
> mount and machine the rack from a block of aluminum.
> Given your experience, what camera and setup would you got for
> when doing it again?
Already had the web-cams.
The Ladybug3 has 6 cameras that does 1600X1200 (2MP) at 15 fps
compressed or 6.5 fps uncompressed using Firewire.
The biggest gain in image size and speed will be with USB3 or gigabit
eithernet, or saving to camera local memory.
The cameras I am using are a combination of 4MP and 5MP but capturing
compressed video is limited to 15 fps at 960X720.
PointGrey does sell the cameras used in the Ladybug separately.
Or something like this http://www.vrmagic.com/en/news_img/
When I ordered the fisheye lenses to use with my setup I did not
consider the position of the NPP of the lens. The Sunex DSL209A would
make a tighter configuration, particularly on a 1/2" CCD sensor.
There are the open hardware cameras, Elphel
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 6:25 AM, Jim Watters <jwatters@...>wrote:
>> I have been working on a multi-camera rig for shooting panorama video.
>> I used inexpensive web-cams because we already had them.
>> Jim Watters
>> Jan Martin wrote:
>>> I'd like to do a kind of Google streetview website and therefore need to
>>> take a panos every 1 second.
>>> From rooftop of a moving car, motorbike, bicycle or on foot.
>>> Alternatives (that are robust enough)?
- Jan Martin wrote:
> http://www.fullview.com/technology.htmlNice overview, but what they write about details and drawbacks of some
> Also nice overview on all the different panorama technologies available
> right now.
technologies is at least partly bullshit, f.e. they write: "Reflection
off a nonplanar mirror is, in general, blurred because each perceived
image point is actually an image of an extended region in space"
This sentence contradicts itself, since if there is a point in the image
it means the image is sharp. Whether this point is a larger area in
reality is a question of resolution. It is true that the image in a
curved mirror appears very small, but this applies to fisheyes as well.
They write: "Single camera looking out through a fisheye lens: Images of
nearby objects are distorted irretrievably, ..." Well, there are a lot
of tight spaces sphericals shot with fisheye lenses out there which
prove this wrong, f.e.: http://worldwidepanorama.org/wwp_rss/go/n3858
I also don't understand, why a "scene must be well illuminated or slow
changing" in order to be shot with a fisheye or spherical mirror...
Obviously the writers of this page didn't learn much since their
"invention" back in 1995...
I was also researching on a multiple camera one shot right. So far just pure research I haven't made any major purchases :)
the MrotatorR panohead from Agnos can hold 3 cropped frame cameras tilted at 60 degrees. Download the examples, like the one in the gondola. But it seems you have to put this very high on your car.
This link was sent by Phil Warner. There's a photo of a rig with 4 cameras. But this one was used on a helicopter. google aerial view?lol
We had a similar thread in the krpano forums
--- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, Jan Martin <janmartin3@...> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am in the process of purchasing a 360 degree one-shot camera.
> May I ask for your input?
> Please find a few examples (raw doughnuts and processed panoramas) at:
> I'd like to do a kind of Google streetview website and therefore need to
> take a panos every 1 second.
> From rooftop of a moving car, motorbike, bicycle or on foot.
> What do you think?
> Is this worth 1100 USD?
> Alternatives (that are robust enough)?
> You will find 3 types of images:
> -d frame extracted from the video the camera takes: 500-700kb
> -p jpg pano made from doughnut: 450 kb
> -sm smaller pano made with 75% setting from jpeg: 90-110 kb
> Please use the picture numbers for you comments:
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]