50D X 500D ? Which one?
- Hello, folks, I hope you can help me. I know it's a personal choice,
but I respect the opinion of the group. I'm in the process of purchase
a new camera, and I'm measuring the pro's and con's of these ones, 50D
and 500D. The big, HUGE point of advantage of the 500D it's the
possibility of capturing movie clips; I can find it for about 1.400
euros with the 17-85mm lens (the kit lens is out of question, will be
put aside forever), and I found the 50D for 1.200 euros with the same
lens. Do you think it's worth it the difference? I mean, I know that
it's nice to have this possibility, but on the other hand, is the 50D
better built enough (this is the only difference I can see) to justify
the lack of movie? I already have the opinion of Pat, which will be
seriously taken, but this new piece of the puzzle (the 1.200 euros
50D) changed things a little.
Thanks a lot in advance,
- --- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, Rodolpho Pajuaba <rpajuaba@...> wrote:
> The big, HUGE point of advantage of the 500D it's thewhat will you use the movies clips for?
> possibility of capturing movie clips;
the form factor / usage dynamics and in the end usability is much different than a camcorder.
20 FPS @ 1920x1080? no good.
30 FPS @ 1280x720 has its applications, but is worth considerably less.
I tried a few things and ended buying a dedicated camcorder. <http://panospace.wordpress.com/2008/10/31/the-most-beautiful-smile-in-the-world/>
Will upgrade the dedicated camera later, when needed, and if it has extra movie clips functionality, why not, but the feature won't have that much weight in the decision.
You may also consider a 100$ 1280x720 camcorder to compensate for the lack of movie function. A lot is possible with them, check <http://river-valley.tv/pitivi-an-overview-of-a-foss-video-editors-history-and-design/>
Looking at the specs of the 50D vs. 500D, the choice is very difficult. In my situation, the pre-investment in plenty of CF-memory would draw me to the 50D; the specs (weight!) to the 500D. If the movie function was important to me, I'd wait to see the 50D successor, although IMO Canon has an interest not to give it movie functionality. Market segmentation.
Whatever you decide, remember that the most important factor is not the tool, is the use that you make of it.
>Looking at the specs of the 50D vs. 500D, the choice is very difficult. InYou might want to check out this site for rumors regarding future hardware:
>my situation, the pre-investment in plenty of CF-memory would draw me to
>the 50D; the specs (weight!) to the 500D. If the movie function was
>important to me, I'd wait to see the 50D successor, although IMO Canon has
>an interest not to give it movie functionality. Market segmentation.
They have a pretty high success rate in getting advance information that
turns out to be accurate. According to their sources, the upcoming 60D will
have movie mode.
- Sometime around 28/5/09 (at 14:37 +0000) yuval_levy said:
>30 FPS @ 1280x720 has its applications, but is worth considerably less.What it *does* give you is a video camera system (of sorts) that has
the potential for much higher-quality optics than most 'true' video
things this side of ex-pen-sive.
But it isn't a normal video camera by any means. I'm not currently
convinced that the ergonomic (form factor) difference is significant
in use, but I'm not convinced that it isn't either.
- Hello, folks,
To all who responded, here and off-list, a big thank you. It helped me
a lot in my choice. Now, if I may, another question: it seems
imposible to find this lens here in Brussels :-( , and, as I'm going
to spend the next weekend in Paris, I'd like to know if and where I
can find it. Does any one of you Paris panographers know it, please?
Of course, if we can arrange a meeting it would be nice too, but I
can't say anything for sure, as it's a trip for the wife, and as
always she's the boss ;-) .
Thanks a lot in advance,