Re: Macro panoramas with webcam
- --- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, "panovrx" <mediavr@...> wrote:
>Looks nice. Just ad an aperture for much more DOF.
> My Sunex mini fisheye lens came today and I had bought another Logitech Quickpro Pro for Notebooks. And I put the two together to make a fisheye 2 Megapixel webcam. The Sunex lens is very tiny -- like the thickness of an AA battery, and 1 cm long. It looks very nicely made and there seems to be a back lens assembly which could be unscrewed so one could add an aperture if one wanted more DOF. It was simple to unscrew and unsolder the original Zeiss lens on the the webcam, and install a lens mount I cannibalized from another webcam Screw the fisheye lens in and it was ready to go. There is no color fringing like you get with cheaper fisheye security camera lenses and the coverage is nearly a circle 180 on this format because the focal length is so short.
I actually experimented with Webcams for doing this a year ago because I had a client who wanted me to do small models in panoramas.
I had to give up on the webcam because of the lack of Mac compatible webcams and because of the lack of aperture in them
I can see that Logitech now have aversion for Mac which looks the same as the 9000.
Another idea would be to use a Mobile.
I would like to connect the webcam with bluetooth to avoid any cables but there is only one Bluetooth Webcam and it is only VGA resolution.
However while searching for bluetooth webcams I found this. http://www.movino.org/
You just need to find a good Mobile with a 5 megapixel camera.
There is a fisheye available for mobiles but the quality is not very good.
Maybe the Sunex could be used.
- Here is another kind of "orbit" webcam, also good for capturing panoramic views
... I've programmed it to look where I want pretty much
This movie is actually with my Logitech/Sunex webcam, being about the central 140 degrees of the fisheye view. The lighting is from the LED on the webcam -- a handy thing for closeup views, pity it is red.
--- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, Ken Warner <kwarner000@...> wrote:
> Gotham City! The first thing I thought was Batman.
> The images stitch well.
> What if you moved the lens farther from the sensor so that you
> could take 4 around. More detail. Sharper -- maybe? Or would you
> loose focus?
> panovrx wrote:
> > Ok here is a work in progress
> > http://www.mediavr.com/bridgestmodel.htm
> > This model is very dark in sections with the available lighting and looks much more colorful (though less atmospheric) with flash -- so I will try a panorama with flash next.
> > Here btw is what it looks like with flash (with my Canon TX1 cameras)
> > http://www.mediavr.com/3d/?p=46
> > Here are some shots of the model with the standard Zeiss lens on the webcam
> > http://www.mediavr.com/modelviews/webcamviews.htm
> > Peter Murphy
> > --- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, Ken Warner <kwarner000@> wrote:
> >>This is a great project!
> >>Can we see some stitched panos?
> >>panovrx wrote:
> >>>I've done a bit more testing with my mini-fisheye webcam (Sunex 216 minifisheye lens + Logitech Notebook Pro webcam). The No Parallax Point is close to the front of the lens -- about 2mm behind the front glass surface, about 1mm behind the beginning of the metal lens barrel.
> >>>The images stitch ok, and the image circle calibrates to about 185 (probably 187 like they say) with low a, b, c distortion values. This corresponds to the visual appearance -- which looks normal fisheye, without the edge compression of the 10.5mm Nikkor.