Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: NP 200 and 300mm Canon

Expand Messages
  • pedro_silva58
    at 6500+euros a pop for the hd, and even 3700+euros for the lowly standard vr... well, it better!
    Message 1 of 32 , Feb 2, 2009
    • 0 Attachment
      at 6500+euros a pop for the hd, and even 3700+euros for the "lowly"
      standard vr... well, it better!

      --- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, John Riley <johnriley@...> wrote:
      >
      > On Feb 1, 2009, at 6:29 PM, Erik Krause wrote:
      >
      > > bigwade wrote:
      > >
      > > > When I see this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1EOJr11bvo&fmt=18
      > > > the camera is mounted the wrong way according to the replies.
      > > > At that distance with a painting I guess it doesn't matter that
      > > much, is it
      > > > ?
      > >
      > > Since the painting is flat it doesn't matter at all: You won't have
      > > parallax.
      > >
      > > But yes, it looks as if they tried to rotate around the front lens
      > > (probably misinterpreting the term "entrance pupil" :-). I would
      > > understand if they rotated around the balance point...
      > >
      > > --
      > > Erik Krause
      > > http://www.erik-krause.de
      >
      >
      > When I saw that video, one of my first thoughts was: Wow - Dr. Clauss
      > has some STRONG sevos on that head - and they hold position well
      > under load!
      >
      > They have to be putting a ridiculous amount of torque on that poor
      > motor.
      >
      > John
      >
      >
      > John Riley
      > johnriley@...
      > jriley@...
      >
      >
      >
      > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      >
    • bigwade
      Hey, Hey.. reshoot of course.. with a very wrong NNP it can be an issue at 2 meters. ... -- View this message in context:
      Message 32 of 32 , Feb 2, 2009
      • 0 Attachment
        Hey, Hey..
        reshoot of course..
        with a very wrong NNP it can be an issue at 2 meters.


        Matthew Rogers-2 wrote:
        >
        > So you want to combine the shots taken at 100mm with the new ones
        > taken at 200mm ? Or do you simply want to reshoot the entire image at
        > 200mm. Either way I still dont see where the parallax issues can occur ?
        >
        >
        >
        > Matt
        >
        > On 2 Feb 2009, at 23:38, bigwade wrote:
        >
        >>
        >> Maybe I'm not clear enough.
        >> First I want to shoot a landscape shot with client in the studio.
        >> Lighting and settings are oké.
        >> Let's say at 100mm.
        >> But the client wants higher resolution.
        >> So I rotate the camera to portrait, zoom in to 200 and make more
        >> shots.
        >> (even with different focussettings to combine in Helicon or whatever)
        >> Parallax will be an issue unless you have big overlap and a lot of
        >> shots.
        >> (BTW the beer will be dead by then.:-)
        >>
        >
        >
        >
        >

        --
        View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/NP-200-and-300mm-Canon-tp21647383p21801493.html
        Sent from the PanoToolsNG mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.