Re: [PanoToolsNG] Re: NP 200 and 300mm Canon
- On Feb 1, 2009, at 6:29 PM, Erik Krause wrote:
> bigwade wrote:When I saw that video, one of my first thoughts was: Wow - Dr. Clauss
> > When I see this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1EOJr11bvo&fmt=18
> > the camera is mounted the wrong way according to the replies.
> > At that distance with a painting I guess it doesn't matter that
> much, is it
> > ?
> Since the painting is flat it doesn't matter at all: You won't have
> But yes, it looks as if they tried to rotate around the front lens
> (probably misinterpreting the term "entrance pupil" :-). I would
> understand if they rotated around the balance point...
> Erik Krause
has some STRONG sevos on that head - and they hold position well
They have to be putting a ridiculous amount of torque on that poor
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- Hey, Hey..
reshoot of course..
with a very wrong NNP it can be an issue at 2 meters.
Matthew Rogers-2 wrote:
> So you want to combine the shots taken at 100mm with the new ones
> taken at 200mm ? Or do you simply want to reshoot the entire image at
> 200mm. Either way I still dont see where the parallax issues can occur ?
> On 2 Feb 2009, at 23:38, bigwade wrote:
>> Maybe I'm not clear enough.
>> First I want to shoot a landscape shot with client in the studio.
>> Lighting and settings are oké.
>> Let's say at 100mm.
>> But the client wants higher resolution.
>> So I rotate the camera to portrait, zoom in to 200 and make more
>> (even with different focussettings to combine in Helicon or whatever)
>> Parallax will be an issue unless you have big overlap and a lot of
>> (BTW the beer will be dead by then.:-)
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/NP-200-and-300mm-Canon-tp21647383p21801493.html
Sent from the PanoToolsNG mailing list archive at Nabble.com.