Re: NP 200 and 300mm Canon
- Which one Matt?
--- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Rogers <matthew@...> wrote:
> You'd be hard pressed to find ANY shooting scenario where you need to
> have a 200 or 300mm lens rotate around the nodal point.
- Hey, Hey..
reshoot of course..
with a very wrong NNP it can be an issue at 2 meters.
Matthew Rogers-2 wrote:
> So you want to combine the shots taken at 100mm with the new ones
> taken at 200mm ? Or do you simply want to reshoot the entire image at
> 200mm. Either way I still dont see where the parallax issues can occur ?
> On 2 Feb 2009, at 23:38, bigwade wrote:
>> Maybe I'm not clear enough.
>> First I want to shoot a landscape shot with client in the studio.
>> Lighting and settings are oké.
>> Let's say at 100mm.
>> But the client wants higher resolution.
>> So I rotate the camera to portrait, zoom in to 200 and make more
>> (even with different focussettings to combine in Helicon or whatever)
>> Parallax will be an issue unless you have big overlap and a lot of
>> (BTW the beer will be dead by then.:-)
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/NP-200-and-300mm-Canon-tp21647383p21801493.html
Sent from the PanoToolsNG mailing list archive at Nabble.com.