Re: Gigapan & Canon G9 examples
- I guess the calibration is needed to set up the movement of the servo.
You would need to calibrate first for maximum possible movement.
Gentled should work as soon it recognizes a big enough change in the
signal modulation of the servo channel.
I used Gentled already with the panobot and the Minolta A-200. It
worked well, but IR shooter in general has some limitations compared
with the cable release.
Bernhard, sorry for messing up this thread, maybe we should open a new
discussion on the technical details ...
--- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, "jo4mail" <jo4mail@...> wrote:
> Hi Traugott,
> the gentleds are fine, but the GP does an initial calibrating on the
> servo, I dont know how this could be done with gent360.
> I totally agree that an opensource/openhardware-concept needs
> dedicated admin and is not a side job.
- That should be obvious.. heh.
Prime versus zoom.
The problem, is 28 isn't really wide enough to be really useful for a lot of
interior work, and composition without zoom and difficult to say the least,
since you often don't have placement luxury.
As an exterior lens, I'm sure it's a great lens to have.
I've always wondered how the MK2 stacks up against, the 10-22, since you
aren't using the outer parts of the lens with the 10-22.
Southern Digital Solutions LLC
From: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com [mailto:PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Matthew Rogers
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 12:05 PM
Subject: Re: [PanoToolsNG] Re: Visible image degadation
Well I've tested the 28 f1.8 and 28 f2.8 against the 16-35 MKI/MK2 and
even the 28 f2.8 easily beats the 16-35 @28 for resolution and
sharpness. The 28mm f1.8 kills it.
On 23 Sep 2008, at 15:50, Sacha Griffin wrote:
> I thought the resolution displayed on the landscape was "decent".
> The shot
> was just a little fuzzy, most likely due to the obvious aberration
> all over the image.
> From what I've heard the 16-35 canon zoom, (canon, zoom, even wider)
> is a
> real hummer of a lens and a different beast altogether than this
> The portrait was a good display of the highlight priority perhaps.
> The landscape wasn't a good example of anything really.
> Sacha Griffin
> Southern Digital Solutions LLC
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]