47365Re: What is the actual Field of View?
- Jan 10, 2011--- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, Jim Watters <jwatters@...> wrote:
> On 2011-01-07 7:03 PM, engstrom_henrik wrote:
> > I am still not completely sure if I received an answer to my original question. That was if the hfov panotools report is the exact same angle as the physical camera sees - i.e. leftmost to rightmost pixel at the vertical center line. Or, if hfov is some virtual camera angle that needs to be radially compensated to get the physical angle. I am leaning to the latter, but am not 100% certain. If so, how shall one compensate the hfov to get the physical angle?
> > Regards
> > Henrik
> The best way to have panotools optimize FoV is to take a 360 pano.
> If you were to optimism HFoV but set the distortion values for abc at 0 then the
> HFoV would be correct.
> If the input images are in portrait then you could optimize HFoV and the abc
> values and HFoV would be correct.
> But if the input images are in landscape mode and there are values for abc then
> the HFoV would be changed slightly from the abc values. Panotools maintains the
> FoV on the shortest dimension when using abc distortion correction. When the
> input images are in portrait the shortest dimension is also the HFoV so even
> with optimizing distortion the HFoV will be the same.
> Up till a couple days I never thought of this. Generally the difference in FoV
> created by the distortion values are small and as long as I got a good finished
> pano I did not care.
> Jim Watters
Your description of the portrait/landscape aspects makes perfect sense to me. If I find any more information on this subject I will post it here.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>