44855Re: Canon 16-35mm at 35mm
- Sep 29, 2010I do a lot of sphericals with 35mm and the best lens so far is my old Zeiss Distagon 35/2,8 which you can get pretty cheap on ebay.
I shoot 3 rows of 12 +z +n. The horizontal overlap is quite enough because there is little vignetting. Only with the zenith shot I sometimes get a visible seem in blue skies which can be a pain to retouch. But I am always to lazy to shoot more images ;)
I should try to take one of those indoors, the level of detail is amazing and the DOF could be enough to get everything sharp on normal tripod heights without stacking.
--- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, Bostjan Burger <si_lander@...> wrote:
> Andrew, it is a good resolution of the taken VRP. Does anyone have an experience
> with Canon EF 17-40 F/4 L USM , which is exactly the half of the price of 16-35
> 2.8 ? I think that F2.8 comparing to F4 doesn't play so much better as this
> lense is for the use of pano head, but I wonder what is the difference with the
> :) Bostjan
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>