Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

44839Re: [PanoToolsNG] Re: Canon 16-35mm at 35mm

Expand Messages
  • Michel Thoby
    Sep 28, 2010
    • 0 Attachment
      Hi Bostjan,

      Le 28 sept. 2010 à 13:32, Bostjan Burger a écrit :

      > Andrew, it is a good resolution of the taken VRP. Does anyone have an experience
      > with Canon EF 17-40 F/4 L USM , which is exactly the half of the price of 16-35
      > 2.8 ? I think that F2.8 comparing to F4 doesn't play so much better as this
      > lense is for the use of pano head, but I wonder what is the difference with the
      > sharpness?
      >
      > :) Bostjan

      There cannot be a simple answer over the whole zooming range although you may read the following reviews:
      Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 USM L II

      Vs

      Canon EF 17-40mm f/4 USM L

      http://www.photozone.de/all-tests

      Michel



      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    • Show all 12 messages in this topic