24232Re: Pano2VR makes different default cubefaces
- Nov 1, 2008--- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, "fierodeval" <fierodeval@...> wrote:
>I agree completelly. The optimal size shown right beside the cubface size is very
> Hi Thomas,
> I saw this behavior too, if I open a 4000x2000 panorama, then the
> default cubeface is width/4 = 1000. But if you use width/4 you are
> loosing quality in all the cubeface, not only in the edges of the
> cubeface. If I display a MOV with 1000x1000 cubefaces I see the same
> quality than with a 3140x1570 equirect.
> I don't understand when you say "loose quality in the center" or
> "sharp line near the cube face". If you modify the cubeface you change
> the quality in all the cubeface, not only in the center or in the
> edge. Or maybe I did not understand anything?
> Another issue about Pano2VR. I always ask me what is the practical
> function of "Optimal" value for the cubeface. This value depends of
> the window size, but almost all panoramas are shown with a percentage
> size of the window, not a fixed size. And the existence of an optimal
> cubesize for a display window size, avoid the possibility to do
> zoom-in in the panorama, because the optimal value is calculated for a
> resolution of 1:1 cubeface:screen. Is this correct?
confusing. It is also not relevant today.
You do not produce movies for zooming in on small displays sizes any more.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>