24209Re: Some more tests on Optimal Cubefaces.
- Nov 1, 2008Hans,
thanks for your efforts to share your findings with us! Hhm, but I
must admit I'm not sure if I do understand this correctly. Do you mean
it's possible to shrink the equirectangular image to 70% of its
original size and divide the corresponding image width by pi without
visible image detail loss? Sorry, maybe this is a dumb question, but I
simply could not get the same values when looking at the example on
To make it simple: Say, there is an equirectangular image with 1000 x
1000 x 0.7 = 700
700 / pi = 222.8169203
So, one could shrink the equirectangular image to 700 x 350 px in
Photoshop and convert this image to six 222 x 222 px cube faces?
Or am I getting something totally wrong here?
Thanks in advance,
--- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, "Hans Nyberg" <hans@...> wrote:
> I have made some more tests on the optimal cubeface sizes.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>