Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

23166RE: [PanoToolsNG] Re: Visible image degadation

Expand Messages
  • Sacha Griffin
    Sep 23, 2008
      That should be obvious.. heh.

      Prime versus zoom.

      The problem, is 28 isn't really wide enough to be really useful for a lot of
      interior work, and composition without zoom and difficult to say the least,
      since you often don't have placement luxury.

      As an exterior lens, I'm sure it's a great lens to have.

      I've always wondered how the MK2 stacks up against, the 10-22, since you
      aren't using the outer parts of the lens with the 10-22.





      Sacha Griffin

      Southern Digital Solutions LLC

      http://www.southern-digital.com

      http://www.seeit360.net

      404-551-4275







      From: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com [mailto:PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com] On
      Behalf Of Matthew Rogers
      Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 12:05 PM
      To: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: Re: [PanoToolsNG] Re: Visible image degadation



      Well I've tested the 28 f1.8 and 28 f2.8 against the 16-35 MKI/MK2 and
      even the 28 f2.8 easily beats the 16-35 @28 for resolution and
      sharpness. The 28mm f1.8 kills it.

      Matt

      On 23 Sep 2008, at 15:50, Sacha Griffin wrote:

      > I thought the resolution displayed on the landscape was "decent".
      > The shot
      > was just a little fuzzy, most likely due to the obvious aberration
      > evident
      > all over the image.
      >
      > From what I've heard the 16-35 canon zoom, (canon, zoom, even wider)
      > is a
      > real hummer of a lens and a different beast altogether than this
      > cheapo
      > lens.
      >
      > The portrait was a good display of the highlight priority perhaps.
      >
      > The landscape wasn't a good example of anything really.
      >
      > Sacha Griffin
      >
      > Southern Digital Solutions LLC
      >
      > http://www.southern-digital.com
      >
      > http://www.seeit360.net
      >
      > 404-551-4275





      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    • Show all 61 messages in this topic