Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

15077Re: [PanoToolsNG] 40D vs XTi for panos

Expand Messages
  • bigwade
    Nov 29, 2007
      Hi Roger,
      If you can, try to compare higher Iso's
      The rebel xti or 400D has some more noise at high Iso's. 100-200 is oké
      If that is not important and you will get a FF also, it's maybe not a bad
      idea to go for the XTi and get a new Nodal Ninja NN5 as a bonus.
      Perfectly oké for the new FF set also, no extra (360P) investments.
      Hey, it isn't a 360P but with a lot smaller footprint and a good starting
      template it will do the job.
      Have Fun !

      rogerhoward wrote:
      > I've been considering an early holiday gift for myself - I've put (way)
      > over 100,000 shots on my poor old 20D and I'm ready for another Canon
      > DSLR for shooting panos... it doesn't have to be used for anything else
      > - I am not real concerned about performance beyond use for panos. I'd
      > love to stick with a 1.6x crop so I don't change the lensing at the
      > moment - I may get a fullframe this year for regular shooting, but since
      > I do a lot with a Sigma 8 I'm not real interested in switching to a
      > fullframe at the moment. That seems to leave me with two good options -
      > 40D and XTi.
      > Anyone have practical experience with both? Aside from body styling
      > differences, opinions? How similar is the body size/proportions between
      > the 20D and 40D? Close enough to use the same 360Precision setup?
      > Thanks for input,
      > R

      View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/40D-vs-XTi-for-panos-tf4892992.html#a14033830
      Sent from the PanoToolsNG mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
    • Show all 12 messages in this topic