15077Re: [PanoToolsNG] 40D vs XTi for panos
- Nov 29, 2007Hi Roger,
If you can, try to compare higher Iso's
The rebel xti or 400D has some more noise at high Iso's. 100-200 is oké
If that is not important and you will get a FF also, it's maybe not a bad
idea to go for the XTi and get a new Nodal Ninja NN5 as a bonus.
Perfectly oké for the new FF set also, no extra (360P) investments.
Hey, it isn't a 360P but with a lot smaller footprint and a good starting
template it will do the job.
Have Fun !
> I've been considering an early holiday gift for myself - I've put (way)
> over 100,000 shots on my poor old 20D and I'm ready for another Canon
> DSLR for shooting panos... it doesn't have to be used for anything else
> - I am not real concerned about performance beyond use for panos. I'd
> love to stick with a 1.6x crop so I don't change the lensing at the
> moment - I may get a fullframe this year for regular shooting, but since
> I do a lot with a Sigma 8 I'm not real interested in switching to a
> fullframe at the moment. That seems to leave me with two good options -
> 40D and XTi.
> Anyone have practical experience with both? Aside from body styling
> differences, opinions? How similar is the body size/proportions between
> the 20D and 40D? Close enough to use the same 360Precision setup?
> Thanks for input,
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/40D-vs-XTi-for-panos-tf4892992.html#a14033830
Sent from the PanoToolsNG mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>