Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

Re: [Pali] How to analyze the word pat.jaananti

Expand Messages
  • tzungkuen
    Dear DimitryThank you a lot! I understand. There is very much treasure here.----- Original Message ----- From: ¬¨â਩ «¥ªá¥¥¢¨ç ¢
    Message 1 of 7 , Jul 15, 2002
      Dear Dimitry

      Thank you a lot!
      I understand.
      There is very much treasure here.

      ----- Original Message -----
      From: "Ź¨âਊ ŤĽŞáĽĽ˘¨ç ˘ ĺ­Ľ­ŞŽ (Dimitry A. Ivakhnenko)" <sangha@...>
      To: "tzungkuen" <Pali@yahoogroups.com>
      Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 1:50 AM
      Subject: Re: [Pali] How to analyze the word pat.jaananti


      > Dear Tzungkuen,
      >
      > t> I didnft know how to analyze the word gpat.jaanantih. If it is
      (pat.i-
      > t> j~naa)pres.3.pl.p, shouldnft it be pat.ijaanaanti? Though I find a
      > t> sentence in PTS DicitionaryFjaananti tam yakkhabhuutaa, I donft why
      > t> it is so. Please help me. Thanks a lot.
      >
      > -anti is a regular form of pres.3.pl. of bases ending with -aa long.
      >
      > Please refer to the declension and conjugation tables available in the
      > Files section of http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pali
      >
      > With metta,
      > Dimitry
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
      > Yahoo! Groups members can set their delivery options to daily digest or
      web only.
      > [Homepage] http://www.tipitaka.net
      > [Send Message] pali@yahoogroups.com
      > [Mailing List] http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pali
      > [Discussion] http://pub45.ezboard.com/btipitakanetwork
      >
      > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
      >


      _________________________________________________________
      Do You Yahoo!?
      Get your free @... address at http://mail.yahoo.com
    • Kumaara Bhikkhu
      ... If you look at your earlier mail, you actually left out the i s: pat.jaanaathaa , pat.jaananti , pat.jaananti . I assume that it wasn t a typing error
      Message 2 of 7 , Jul 16, 2002
        At 12:00 AM 16-07-02, tzungkuen wrote:
        >Dear Ven. Kumaara:
        >
        >Thanks for your reply
        >I also used CSCD version. I think my 'pat.ijaananti'is equal to your "pa.tijaananti"
        >the t in the prefix "pati-" is a cerebral.

        If you look at your earlier mail, you actually left out the "i"s: "pat.jaanaathaa", "pat.jaananti", 'pat.jaananti'. I assume that it wasn't a typing error in your part since it's the same in all three instances. I thought that's the cause of confusion.

        > The problem is its inflection.
        >Can it
        >be analyzed into (pa.ti-j~naa)3.pl.p ? if it can, why (pa.ti-j~naa)3.s.p is pa.tijaanaati.

        Why not?

        peace

        Ven Kumâra
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.