Re: [Pali] How to analyze the word pat.jaananti
- Dear Dimitry
Thank you a lot!
There is very much treasure here.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ź¨âŕ¨Š ŤĽŞáĽĽ˘¨ç ˘ ĺĽŞŽ (Dimitry A. Ivakhnenko)" <sangha@...>
To: "tzungkuen" <Pali@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 1:50 AM
Subject: Re: [Pali] How to analyze the word pat.jaananti
> Dear Tzungkuen,
> t> I didnft know how to analyze the word gpat.jaanantih. If it is
> t> j~naa)pres.3.pl.p, shouldnft it be pat.ijaanaanti? Though I find a
> t> sentence in PTS DicitionaryFjaananti tam yakkhabhuutaa, I donft why
> t> it is so. Please help me. Thanks a lot.
> -anti is a regular form of pres.3.pl. of bases ending with -aa long.
> Please refer to the declension and conjugation tables available in the
> Files section of http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pali
> With metta,
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> Yahoo! Groups members can set their delivery options to daily digest or
> [Homepage] http://www.tipitaka.net
> [Send Message] email@example.com
> [Mailing List] http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pali
> [Discussion] http://pub45.ezboard.com/btipitakanetwork
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @... address at http://mail.yahoo.com
- At 12:00 AM 16-07-02, tzungkuen wrote:
>Dear Ven. Kumaara:If you look at your earlier mail, you actually left out the "i"s: "pat.jaanaathaa", "pat.jaananti", 'pat.jaananti'. I assume that it wasn't a typing error in your part since it's the same in all three instances. I thought that's the cause of confusion.
>Thanks for your reply
>I also used CSCD version. I think my 'pat.ijaananti'is equal to your "pa.tijaananti"
>the t in the prefix "pati-" is a cerebral.
> The problem is its inflection.Why not?
>be analyzed into (pa.ti-j~naa)3.pl.p ? if it can, why (pa.ti-j~naa)3.s.p is pa.tijaanaati.