- Dear Ole and Rett, many thanks for your kind help, Nina.Message 1 of 1247 , Sep 1, 2005View SourceDear Ole and Rett,
many thanks for your kind help,
op 31-08-2005 22:17 schreef Ole Holten Pind op oleholtenpind@...:
> There really is no problem. The only problem is one of punctuation. Read:
> yajjeta.m mocetum icchasi tassagghanaka.m dhana.m datvaa muñcaapehiiti, "If
> you want him to become free, cause him to become free by paying money equal
> to him in value."
- Hello Jayarava and friends, In Norman s translation of the Dhammapada, in his note for v.259, he directs the reader s attention to verses 8, 128, 168, 172 andMessage 1247 of 1247 , Jul 4, 2011View SourceHello Jayarava and friends,
In Norman's translation of the Dhammapada, in his note for v.259, he directs the reader's attention to verses 8, 128, 168, 172 and 177, where there is the same consonant doubling of p before na as in v.259 (pamajjati to nappamajjati) after what he calls the 'proclitic' use of na. So the formation seems to be a regular phonological feature in Pali.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]