Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: Pali Day by Day 10/01/2004 [D065]

Expand Messages
  • Ong Yong Peng
    Dear Charles and friends, yes, you are right. Thanks for pointing that out. metta, Yong Peng ... Wouldn t their be associated with the nearer in temple : I
    Message 1 of 1247 , Oct 7, 2004
    • 0 Attachment
      Dear Charles and friends,

      yes, you are right. Thanks for pointing that out.


      metta,
      Yong Peng

      --- In Pali@yahoogroups.com, Charles Ball wrote:
      Wouldn't "their" be associated with the nearer "in temple": "I was
      the chief in their temple"?
      >
      > 4. Aha.m tesa.m aaraame adhipati ahosi.m.
      > I / their / in temple / chief / was
      > I was their chief in the temple.
    • Dhivan Thomas Jones
      Hello Jayarava and friends, In Norman s translation of the Dhammapada, in his note for v.259, he directs the reader s attention to verses 8, 128, 168, 172 and
      Message 1247 of 1247 , Jul 4, 2011
      • 0 Attachment
        Hello Jayarava and friends,

        In Norman's translation of the Dhammapada, in his note for v.259, he directs the reader's attention to verses 8, 128, 168, 172 and 177, where there is the same consonant doubling of p before na as in v.259 (pamajjati to nappamajjati) after what he calls the 'proclitic' use of na. So the formation seems to be a regular phonological feature in Pali.

        Dhivan

        www.dhivan.net



        [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.