Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

Re: nappamajjati - not negligent?

Expand Messages
  • Dhivan Thomas Jones
    Hello Jayarava and friends, In Norman s translation of the Dhammapada, in his note for v.259, he directs the reader s attention to verses 8, 128, 168, 172 and
    Message 1 of 1247 , Jul 4 3:29 AM
      Hello Jayarava and friends,

      In Norman's translation of the Dhammapada, in his note for v.259, he directs the reader's attention to verses 8, 128, 168, 172 and 177, where there is the same consonant doubling of p before na as in v.259 (pamajjati to nappamajjati) after what he calls the 'proclitic' use of na. So the formation seems to be a regular phonological feature in Pali.

      Dhivan

      www.dhivan.net



      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    • Dhivan Thomas Jones
      Hello Jayarava and friends, In Norman s translation of the Dhammapada, in his note for v.259, he directs the reader s attention to verses 8, 128, 168, 172 and
      Message 1247 of 1247 , Jul 4 3:29 AM
        Hello Jayarava and friends,

        In Norman's translation of the Dhammapada, in his note for v.259, he directs the reader's attention to verses 8, 128, 168, 172 and 177, where there is the same consonant doubling of p before na as in v.259 (pamajjati to nappamajjati) after what he calls the 'proclitic' use of na. So the formation seems to be a regular phonological feature in Pali.

        Dhivan

        www.dhivan.net



        [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.