Re: [Pali] Re: Saddaniiti
- George wrote:
> Ito para.m pavakkhaami, sotuuna.m mati-va.d.dhana.mThe particle 'naama' here in the sense of 'by name' or 'called' is puzzling
> kriyaa-pada-kkama.m naama, vibhatt'-aadiini diipaya.m.
to me. I have in mind (perhaps in error) that the masc. acc. -kkama.m would
need to be in the masc. nom. case, i.e., -kkamo if it is to be followed by
'naama' in this sense. I propose that 'naama' belongs instead with
'vibhatt'-aadiini' in the same compound, i.e., 'naama-vibhatt'-aadiini'.
> The translation of these verses which I offered was:[...]
> I will explain, for the growth of my audience's wisdom,
> the terminology of verbs, starting with endings.
> I now recount, to enhance the understanding of students,I'm still undecided on whether 'sotuuna.m' is gen. or dat. pl. Either seems
> the terminology of verbs, explaining the endings, etc.
to work but I do question if a gen. pl. can relate directly to the
adjectival compound instead of the tappurisa compound that follows it. I
offer the following tentative translation of the gaathaa:
From here on, showing the terms and the conjugational endings and so on, I
will present to listeners (i.e., students) the permutation of the verb
(i.e., bhavati) which will serve to widen (one's) understanding (or
Near the beginning of the 2nd pariccheda is the following:
> tattha ti anti, si tha, mi ma, te ante, se vhe, e mhe iccetaaAggava.msa has presented a series of 12 present tense conjugational endings
> vattamaanaavibhattiyo naama.
which are denoted by the technical term: vattamaanavibhattiyo. This is an
example of what I think Aggava.msa means when he says: naamavibhatti- (the
terms and their endings). Naama is used as a synonym of sa~n~naa (technical
Best wishes to all in the New Year 2009!
- Dear Mahinda,
Thanks! I agree with you on both of your objections. I also found a
'naamavibhattiihi' in the 6th pariccheda and the obvious meaning of 'noun
endings' there would also have to apply to a conjectured naama-vihbatt'- in
the 2nd pariccheda which, by the way, has something to say about the noun
endings or the absence thereof (see avibhattikaniddeso). In the case of your
objection regarding 'naama' and the cases of words that can precede it, I
was unsure about this to start with. Thanks for quoting the examples with
the accusative and genitive cases and thereby clearing up the matter for me.
> Dear Jim, George and others,
> With reference to Jim's exegesis, I see two possible objections:
> (1) Compounding naama with vibhattyaadiini will give the sense "I will
> explain the noun endings etc." (naama being a technical term in Pali
> grammar for noun) . This will not fit this chapter since it deals with
> kriyaavibhatti etc.
> (2) It is not mandatory that the referent of naama should be in the
> nominative case. Compare the following: (a) so gaama-vaasiihi saddhi.m
> agga-sassa-daana.m naama adaasi. (b) aha.m gotama-buddhassa naama
> saasane agga-savaka-.t.thaana.m patthesi.m. In these instances the
> referent is in the accusative and genetive cases. The examples are
> from The Aggasaavaka-vatthu of the Dhammapada commentary.