Re: About Kissing...
- Photopolymer might have great printing qualities but it cannot produce
work on a par with the type of plate work that was produced during
that previous era. Much of which required specialized manipulative
techniques and hand work. The problem with photopolymer is two-fold.
There is no way to alter the sub- or surface structure other than
through minor adjustments in processing times, and pre-press work in
photo-editing programs cannot manipulate or adjust the imaging
significantly or adequately for the requirements of that type of plate
work. The manner in which the photopolymer plate relief structure is
formed, which is quite unlike that of photomechanical plates, and
certainly unlike that of metal type, can also contribute to problems
during extended presswork, specifically "bridging" between surface
elements. Photopolymer might deceptively seem to be the easy button
but even in the most "careful" and controlled of printing situations,
it still has inherent limitations.
And as we all know, photopolymer is
> the answer for the perfect plate material, so any of the wildly
> complex plates used in the IP could certainly be duplicated in
- I'm sorry, but what is the difference between trimming and cutting?
On Oct 3, 2007, at 12:46 PM, David Goodrich wrote:
> At an APHA of NY meeting last night where we were privileged to
> peruse a
> number of volumes from the ATF collection in the Columbia University
> Library, I found a small printed slip of paper inside the cover of the
> Kelmscott Press' "Golden Legend" that read:
> IF this book is to be bound, the edges of the leaves should only be
> not cut. In no case should the book be pressed, as that would
> destroy the
> "impression" of the type and thus injure the appearance of the
> W. MORRIS
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]