Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: Calligraphy and deep impression

Expand Messages
  • Gerald Lange
    Hi I m not certain about the timeline in the evolution of the book form in various parts of the world, but I suppose I could walk over to my library; but it is
    Message 1 of 9 , Sep 3 5:55 PM

      I'm not certain about the timeline in the evolution of the book form
      in various parts of the world, but I suppose I could walk over to my
      library; but it is too hot to make the effort.

      It's quite possible that some enterprising young Roman did come up
      with a way to use multiple punches for such a purpose. The way it
      worked out successfully though, is all that matters. 14th century
      Europe, not the Roman Empire, not Asia, was prime for the development.

      Printing preses were in existence—all that was required was to work
      out the complexities of the hose. Punchcutting and casting technology
      had been perfected. Paper had been used for writing, and for printing,
      for some time. The casting properties of lead were clearly understood.
      The use of ink for painting on metal was known. A well developed
      knowledge of metallurgy and mechanics, an effective mercantile
      structure, unrestricted trade channels, standardization of mechanical
      parts and tools that could be used without specific application,
      etc.—all in place.

      All was there, it seems, except for the adjustable casting mould, the
      tool that would allow letters to be spaced as if they were hand written.


      --- In PPLetterpress@yahoogroups.com, Peter Fraterdeus <peterf@...> wrote:
      > Hi Gerald
      > At 4:17 PM -0700 3 09 07, Gerald Lange wrote:
      > >...Even the medallions that protected Marco Polo and
      > >other westerns in their journeys, the paiza, issued by the Khan, appear
      > >to have been cast from punches. It is uncertain if any of the Asian
      > >paper materials that had been printed from cast type made their way to
      > >Europe.
      > Yes, it's really fascinating to see the wax "punches" used by the
      Romans*, and consider how matters might have turned out if some
      enterprising Roman had thought to use multiples of these things to
      produce movable type -- rudimentary as it may have been -- 1500 years
      before Gutenberg
      > *I recall the example in Fred Goudy's "The Alphabet and Elements of
      > However, the 'books' I was thinking of were the woodcut books, full
      pages from each block, regarding Mr. David's attitude about
      impressions from calligraphic originals, regardless of the form,
      scroll or codex.
      > As far as the codex, I'm not sure that it was exclusive to the West
      *, in any case, as there are plenty of examples of Oriental scrolls
      bound as 'accordion' books, or in fact, of accordions punched through
      and sewn. (Of which, I'm sure sure you are aware!)
      > However, I don't recall the time line of when these are known.
      Perhaps it's after contact with the West...
      > *unless the technical definition precludes accordion books in favor
      of collections of signatures...
      > Not my area of expertise, but I'm interested ;-)
      > Ciao!
      > P
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.