[PPLetterpress] Re: Pagelayout Software
- Peter Fraterdeus wrote:
>RIP is a Raster Image Processor, which interprets the "Page DescriptionGenerally true, however it overlooks one important point, which is that
>Language (aka Postscript)" and produces a Very High Resolution bitmap
>which is then translated by the imaging engine (with laser pulses, for
>instance) to your film or other media.
>RIPs run Postscript, they're not "designed" for Quark or Pagemaker.
there are different levels of PostScript. QuarkXPress and older RIPs
only understand Level 1, the oldest version.
But the latest and greatest Adobe programs like InDesign output advanced
PostScript (called Level 2 and Level 3). To output Level 3 files you
need a Level 3 RIP.
It's understandable that printers who are too cheap to upgrade a RIP
will want to stick to a Level 1 workflow as long as they can.
>A proper Adobe Postscript interpreter will have no trouble at all withPDF and PostScript share a graphics model, but are not the same.
>a properly rendered PDF. In fact there is fundamentally no difference
>between an EPS and a PDF except that the PDF has additional headers.
>Both are pure postscript.
PostScript is a graphics programming language, PDF isn't.
- I just came from an all-day Adobe seminar. Many of the questions that have
been bouncing around on this list were addressed, and I will try to dig
through my notes to pass along the tips I learned. If you have a chance to
see this dog and pony show from Adobe (it's free) I highly recommend it.
It's useful not only to see what the newer technology can do, but to realize
why they are building things the way they are, and how to utilize their
software to increase productivity and efficiency for more fun and fewer
headaches. Most of the day was devoted to In Design, which blows Quark and
Pagemaker right out of the water in too many ways to mention.
They also talked a lot about Acrobat 6 which is due out in May (still in
beta they said) and yes, it will solve many of the problems that have
plagued earlier versions and has way cool new features besides.
on 4/23/03 9:32 AM, Gerald Lange at bieler@... wrote:
> Just a note on this. Acrobat 6 on the Mac, which is now available, is
> not compatible with any OS before OSX. Looks like Adobe is snuggled up
> in bed with Apple again.
>> Acrobat 6 is about to be released. Perhaps it will allow more
>> It will be great when it actually works the way it claims.
> To respond to a post or post a message to the membership:
> Encountering problems? contact:
> To unsubscribe:
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/