Re: [PPLetterpress] Re: Roycroft Presses
- Shockingly, wikipedia is a bit inaccurate. The Pearl & C&P
(and most if not all of the type) at the Roycroft shops
now are not original to the site. They were local presses
and printshop items donated to the Campus as part of the
recent restorations. The presses are currently located in
the Copper Shop building. There have been discussions of
restoring the printshop...anyone interested in more info
should ask Joe Weber who is on the Letpress list
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:59:25 -0000
"author50401" <JohnH@...> wrote:
> The photo Gary has directed us to is of a press in a
>small demonstration printshop on the current-day Roycroft
>Campus. I think you will find in looking further, that
>the Roycroft printing enterprise was using much larger
>equipment. If you take a look at an uncut Roycroft book,
>you will see that a single signature was printed on a
>very large sheet of paper. Hubbard himself speaks to this
>point in an essay which appeared in the "Philistine" (I
>believe 1903) when he says he went to the bank and
>borrowed money to buy a cylinder press, then, in order to
>pay off the loan, had to buy another cylinder press to
>increase the volume of printing, which required yet
>another trip to the bank. Of course, he said it much
>better than I could, but you get the meat of the message.
> They also use Colt Armory presses in the shop. If that
>Pearl is from the original shop, it was probably used for
>letterheads and business cards.
> John Henry
> Cedar Creek Press
> --- In PPLetterpress@yahoogroups.com, "Gary"
>> Yup. Another excellent suggestion.
>> Both of these presses have separate bases, which
>> makes it convenient, and have a small "footprint",
>> so they take up little room. Plus built in storage.
>> And you'd be surprised the work that can be done
>> on a 7x11 format!
>> Steve: I'm glad you used the term "Parlour Presses".
>> Heh, I've called them that, but only as a guess. I
>> did not know, in fact, that they were actually called
>> such. Now I feel vindicated :>)
>> Leenah: if you ever have a doubt as to the ability of
>> the smaller Pearl OS or Improved ( the improved has
>> the advantage of the rails travelling aside the ink
>> disk, thus ensuring roller rotation, something found
>> on the more sophisticated platen jobbers )- google the
>> print shop of Roycroft Press. The Roycrofters movement
>> began there, fostered by Elbert Hubbard, and co-incided
>> with the latter 19th and early 20th century "Arts and
>> Craft" movement. They printed marvellous products for
>> a fairly lengthy span, publish pieces, I think the
>> Leather Library' got it's inspiration, it not it's very
>> start there. That's another story.
>> ONE press was used, the 7x11 Golding Improved, vid:
>> . . . it's still there.
>> Google around and check out the incredible work spawned
>> by the Press at Roycroft (Elbert Hubbard)
>> So there ya go! Suggestion and History lesson. Hee.
>> The coolest thing about these old presses is the legacy
>> they carry with them!
>> G. Johanson, Settlement Printer
>> Florida Pioneer Settlement for the Creative Arts
>> Barberville / Deltona, Florida.
>> --- In PPLetterpress@yahoogroups.com, Steve Robison
>> > Leenah,
>> > The 7 x 11 "Improved" Pearls are also great presses.
>>They're not quite as cool and Victorian antiquey as the
>>earlier models, but the improvement is that they have a
>>throw off lever and are build a bit heftier.
>> > They're heavier and tougher to move. But if you take
>>them off the base, and move the separate parts with the
>>help of several strong friends, they will easily go
>>through a regular 3 ft. wide doorway with ease. Years
>>ago, I moved mine in my VW van with ease.
>> > Pearls were known as "Parlor Presses" because they
>>could come through residential doorways into one's
>>parlor. A lot of great writers and poets got started by
>>printing their own works in their homes on small parlor
>>presses like the Pearl.
>> > Best wishes,
>> > Steve Robison
>> > The Robison Press
>> > Belmont, CA - about 25 miles south of San Francisco
>> > robisonsteve@
> Yahoo! Groups Links
- --- In PPLetterpress@yahoogroups.com, <richard@...> wrote:
>******* I guess I shouldn't be too surprised (sigh)
> Shockingly, wikipedia is a bit inaccurate. The Pearl & C&P
> (and most if not all of the type) at the Roycroft shops
> now are not original to the site. . . .
My point was that the Pearls in discussion were capable of
doing pretty impressive work. Unfortunately I chose - once
again - a wiki source. But I went there because I had understood
Roycroft to use the Pearl Improved, not from wikipedia, but
from info I've come across when looking up origins of the
Little Leather Library. I'll have to look into that again,
perhaps the Pearls were part of the early production of those