70Re: Generating direct to film
- Aug 30, 2001Dear Paul
If I remember Xante had a special piece of equipment that you would
put the film in to process the negatives. Do you know what the
chemicals used for this are?
Laser Buddy consists of Acetone and Isobutyl Acetate, a bit rude, as
they say. Is this similar to the chemical recipe used for the Xante
processing? The reason I ask is that Laser Buddy is a spray can, I
can't imagine there would be enough control here to expect exacting
reproduction, and I'd hate to be going back to the pre-water wash days
when PP was a chemical bath operation.
Though I suppose if you are to process film negatives on this level
you are going to be dealing with chemical processes. Imagesetters
don't use toner (aren't they silver based) so I suspect this is a
faulty direction. Would appreciate any responses to this from anyone.
I've tried Laser Buddy on a printed laser piece and it certainly pops
up the dark. It is actually a Document Spray that "dramatically
improves the quality of any toner-generated image" (ie, it make them
darker. Nice catch phrase though "High Resolution in a Can"!
--- In PPLetterpress@y..., "Dr P.B. Watry" <Pwatry@l...> wrote:
> We do have a Xante Platemaker 3 over here which we use mainly as our
> networked printer in the department. For this purpose, it's great;
> although I don't think it would produce output of sufficient
> quality to support PP letterpress printing. If anyone has had
> experience with this, please get in touch with me (reply to the list).
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Gerald Lange wrote:
> >Linda Dare at Otis Laboratory Press has successfully worked out a way
> >of printing direct to negative film on a laser printer by using a
> >product called Laser Buddy (used in the silk screen industry). This
> >supposedly increases the opacity without effecting translucency. She
> >suggests it works well for illustrative matter.
> >I suspect that with laser printers now capable of generating at
> >1200dpi (which is camera ready quality) and others, such as the Xante,
> >capable of generating at 2400dpi (minimum imagesetter dpi for film),
> >this may be an eventual way of generating film negatives in-house for
> >type also, though I also suspect the letterform optimization will be
> >even more crucial here.
> >* I have previously considered the Xante because of its ability to
> >generate direct to film and/or photopolymer, but these materials
> >(which I've looked at) are not yet at the quality standard required
> >for letterpress, nor were they intended for such use.
> >I have asked Linda to come on board here, and perhaps when she does,
> >she will explain this in more detail.
> >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>