11242Re: [PPLetterpress] Re: Plate walking
- Dec 9, 2009I should mention the plates can move out of register on Vandercooks as well.
Cylinder presses can move steel backed plates out of register during deep
impression printing. The problem is that magnetic bases hold the plates down
but don't resist shearing well. This was the genesis for our Boxcar Base and
plastic backed plates in the first place ten years ago. Since many printers
resort to adhesives to hold their plates in place (even on Bunting Bases),
we figured we could just do away with the magnet and use an adhesive that
works--one that resists shearing. We run our plastic backed plates on a
Heidelberg Cylinder (long multi-color runs) and on Vandercooks and have
never had this problem.
I hope this helps,
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Scott Rubel <scott@...> wrote:
> What kinds of forces does it take to make a steel plate on a Bunting
> base move? Even with all the relational physics answers posted earlier,
> once the plate gets over a few inches I can't imagine how it could move.
> Harold Kyle wrote:
> > OK I was confused by this thread, and talked with Matthew off-list.
> > Apparently he has a Bunting base, which is 0.858, as we do mention on our
> > website. That much is correct. I thought mistakenly he was referring to
> > Deep Relief base. He is also apparently ordering 152SB steel backed
> > but I can't see how they would be thicker than 0.060. He's going to test
> > them with another measuring tool and report back.
> > Sorry for the confusion!
> > Harold
> > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Harold Kyle <harold@...<harold%40boxcarpress.com>>
> >> Matthew:
> >> Our records show that you purchased KF152, which measures 0.060 but
> >> with 0.004 film adhesive. This means the plate should measure 0.064
> >> Is your plate transparent or does it have a rigid metal back?
> >> means KF152.
> >> I couldn't find a base purchase under your name in our system, which I
> >> would need to get the exact measurements of your base. I would be
> >> if we shipped a 0.8585" base, which is way out of spec. The actual
> >> should be 0.0853 +/- 0.001. Can you share with me the serial number
> >> on the side?
> >> I don't see reference to 0.858" as the base thickness on
> >> but I do see this height mentioned incorrectly on some other websites.
> >> write to them to clarify in order to avoid any future confusion. The
> >> height is 0.853".
> >> Thanks
> >> Harold
> >> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 9:40 AM, matthew lamoureux <lamsland@...<lamsland%40yahoo.com>
> >>> Next time I'm there I'm going to bring my table top micrometer. It's an
> >>> extremely precise dial caliper mounted on a stand. The thing that's
> >>> bothering me is we
> >>> ordered the base ground to Boxcar's specs listed on their site, .858".
> >>> The hand held dial caliper reads .8585". We measured the base and plate
> >>> together while the base was locked in the chase, which was a bit
> tricky, but
> >>> checked it a couple of times and got .922". Without actually measuring
> >>> plate alone that would mean the plate was .0635" - .064". Why would the
> >>> plates be .004" higher than what's listed on the site for 152SB?
> >>> ________________________________
> >>> A thinner plate ia indicated; If you are using a 152 go to a 145.
> >>> --Eric Holub, SF
> >>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >> --
> >> ---
> >> Boxcar Press
> >> 501 W. Fayette St. #222
> >> Syracuse, NY 13204
> >> www.boxcarpress.com
501 W. Fayette St. #222
Syracuse, NY 13204
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>