Re: BAB on formulas
- ?? I'm lost... You mean doing BONUS:COMBAT|BAB|BAB ? Well, it already
could happen, like this: BONUS:STAT|INT|2*INT or
BONUS:STAT|STR|STRSCORE. In theory, this also goes cyclic. But don't
worry, that's not what i'm think on using it on. I'll only use it on
a PRE kind of thing.
--- In PCGenListFileHelp@yahoogroups.com, "Tir Gwaith" <thoron-tir-
> If you can start referencing BAB in formulas, and then referencethe formula
> in a COMBAT|BAB| statment, you will get a cyclical loop. Do wereally want
> Tir Gwaith
> PCGen Data SB and BoD
> At 16:15 2003.06.25, Felipe F. Diniz wrote:
> >Well, i don't think it is a bug. BAB was never needed on formulas,
> >it was never implemented. I am not saying that BONUS:COMBAT|BAB|1the
> >does not work, this one does. I mean BONUS:VAR|XXXX|BAB. It's not
> >same thing...
> >I looked into the code, and it does not exist.
> >Anyway, i created a FREQ assigned to me for this one.