Re: [PCGenListFileHelp] Re: Questions on adding feats from a list
The Abilitycategory is the replacement to the ADDs, it does allow freedom to alter your choice if
you goof up (With add, well you have to level down which is not fun).
And with the new UI, you have a summary spot that sends you to any outstanding items. :) *It works
On 6/26/2012 12:26 PM, zorden@... wrote:
> Thanks! I did manage to solve what i wanted and you are right about ignored requirements in case of ADD:FEAT. ABILITYCATEGORY is a good idea but my players like the popups more than searching for abilities on another tab. :-) Thanks again!
> --- In PCGenListFileHelp@yahoogroups.com, Doug Limmer <adventure@...> wrote:
>> On 6/21/2012 8:37 AM, zorden@... wrote:
>>> One of my new class gains one bonus feat per 5 levels from a special
>>> list. I could code this (not nicely) but I have some questions:
>>> 1) If I code in the class.lst
>>> 5 <tab> ADD:FEAT|1|feat 1, feat2, feat3
>>> it works correctly, displays the chooser, user can choose which feat
>>> she likes. If I create an ability which uses the same ADD:FEAT token
>>> and in the class.lst I grant this ability with
>>> ABILITY:Special Ability|AUTOMATIC|Bonus Feat Ability
>>> the ability is granted but the chooser does not show up, no feats can
>>> be selected. Why is that?
>> I'm going from memory here, but if you want the chooser for ADD:FEAT to
>> show up, you need to use ADD:ABILITY instead of just ABILITY. (You might
>> need to change AUTOMATIC to NORMAL, too; I forget.)
>>> 2) In the list of feats there are some Spell Focus and Greater Spell
>>> Focus feats beside the Spell Penetration and Greater Spell
>>> Penetration. When first the chooser is displayed the Greater Spell
>>> Focus feats don't show up because for them Spell Focus feats are
>>> requirements. And this is absolutely correct. But at the same time
>>> Greater Spell Penetration is shown up and selectable despite the Spell
>>> Penetration is not yet gained. When the Greater Spell Penetration is
>>> selected it is added to the user's feats and is marked with red.
>>> So why does PCGen work correctly in case of Spell Focus - Greater
>>> Spell Focus and why does not in case of Spell Penetration - Greater
>>> Spell Penetration?
>> Is this for your ADD:FEAT tag, or for Spell Penetration/Greater Spell
>> Penetration in general?
>> If it's for your ADD:FEAT tag, I think ADD:FEAT ignores prerequisites,
>> which is why you can choose Greater Spell Penetration. Greater Spell
>> Focus has a CHOOSE:FEAT=Spell Focus tag, which means for it to activate
>> (show up?) you need a Spell Focus feat. (It's not a PRExxx tag, so it's
>> not ignored.)
>> You should have better control of prerequisites if you make this using
>> ABILITYCATEGORY instead of ADD:FEAT.
>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> Yahoo! Groups Links
Andrew Maitland (LegacyKing)
Admin Silverback - PCGen Board of Directors
Data 2nd, Docs Tamarin, OS Lemur
Unique Title "Quick-Silverback Tracker Monkey"
Unique Title "The Torturer of PCGen"
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]