Repressive religion bill put back to autumn again
- KESTON INSTITUTE, OXFORD, UK
KESTON NEWS SERVICE: 20.00, 1 July 2002
Reporting on violations of religious liberty and on religion in communist
and post-communist lands.
BELARUS: REPRESSIVE RELIGION BILL PUT BACK TO
by Felix Corley, Keston News Service
As the current session of parliament expired last Friday (28 June),
supporters of the restrictive new religion law failed to have the text
approved by the upper chamber of parliament, the Council of the
Republic, despite a last minute rush. The lower house of parliament, the
Chamber of Representatives, voted on 26 June to postpone holding the
second reading, only to overturn the decision and to approve the bill in a
controversial move the following day (see KNS 28 June 2002). "The bill
was not placed on the agenda of the Council of the Republic on Friday, as
it had only completed passage through the lower house at 8 pm the
previous evening," Aleksandr Vertinsky of the Council of the Republic
secretariat told Keston News Service from Minsk on 1 July. "Deputies did
not have time to acquaint themselves with the text approved by the lower
Anatoli Novikov, an official of the upper chamber's Commission for
Social Questions, which is now handling the bill, confirmed that it will
now be considered in the autumn session, which begins on 2 October,
"unless there is the need to call an extraordinary session". "There have
been no such calls at present, but according to the constitution the
president can call an extraordinary session if enough deputies demand it,
though this is very rare," he told Keston from Minsk on 1 July.
Vladimir Lameka, deputy chairman of the State Committee for Religious
and Ethnic Affairs, also confirmed to Keston by telephone from Minsk on
1 July that consideration of the law had now been put off to the autumn.
Novikov said that his commission had not yet had time to consider the
bill, and would not do so until after parliament resumes in October, but
might hold seminars about the issue over the summer break.
The Belarusian Orthodox Church under the Moscow Patriarchate - the
biggest denomination in Belarus with more than 1,200 registered parishes
- continues to back the new draft unequivocally and is disappointed
consideration of it has been put back to the autumn. "We hoped the law
would be adopted in this session," spokesman for Metropolitan Filaret
(Vakhromeyev), Andrei Petrashkevich, told Keston by telephone from
Minsk on 1 July. "Unfortunately it wasn't." Although he said his Church
had spoken up for the "urgent adoption" of the law many times, he
stressed that he had no complaints against deputies of either chamber of
parliament. "The deputies of the Council of the Republic decided they
wanted to study the articles of the law in more detail. That is their right."
If signed by the president, the new law would be the most repressive
religion law in any former Soviet republic other than Turkmenistan or
Uzbekistan. It would outlaw unregistered religious activity, introduce
compulsory prior censorship for all religious literature; publishing,
education and charitable activity would be restricted to faiths that had ten
registered communities in 1982; there would be a ban on all but
occasional, small religious meetings in private homes (see KNS 17 June
and 28 May 2002). While Orthodox and Catholic representatives have
broadly welcomed or accepted the bill, Protestants and leaders of
minority faiths have sharply criticised it. Leaders of four main Protestant
communities, the Baptists, the Pentecostals, the Full Gospel Church and
the Adventists, held a press conference on 28 June to repeat their
The four Protestant leaders, Bishop Nikolai Sinkovets of the Baptist
Union, Bishop Sergei Khomich of the Pentecostal Union, Aleksandr
Sakovich of the Full Gospel Association and Moisei Ostrovsky of the
Adventist Church, wrote to President Aleksandr Lukashenko on 1 July to
express their bewilderment at the hasty adoption of the bill by the lower
house of parliament and to request a meeting to discuss continuing moves
to adopt the law. "The impression is being created that someone wants to
adopt this law - which would lead only to conflicts and disputes - without
serious and balanced discussion and without taking into account the
reality of the religious situation in our country."
Petrashkevich of the Orthodox Church declined to comment on the
content of the bill, claiming that it had support from "all the traditional
faiths, the Orthodox, the Catholics, the Lutherans, the Jews and the
Muslims". He claimed that only the "neo-Protestants" and the "new
religious movements" were unhappy with it. He referred all enquiries on
the bill's content to Andrei Aleshko, legal advisor to Metropolitan Filaret.
Keston was unable to reach Aleshko by telephone on 1 July.
Given that the new law, if adopted, would make it impossible for foreign
citizens to head religious organisations, Keston asked Petrashkevich
whether the Moscow-born Filaret was a Russian or Belarusian citizen.
"He is an ethnic Russian, but I don't know about his citizenship - I've
never asked him and I've never seen his passport," Petrashkevich
responded, though he said that he believed he is a citizen of Belarus as he
takes part in elections.
This provision in the draft law could also obstruct the emergence of the
Armenian Church, which has not yet opened any places of worship in
Belarus for the estimated 10,000 Armenians in the country. A spokesman
for the Armenian embassy in Minsk told Keston on 26 June that
ambassador Suren Harutyunyan is already in discussion over plans to
build a church in the Belarusian capital. The spokesman said there is
currently no resident priest, although some services have been held in
Orthodox churches. No Armenian priests are believed to have Belarusian
citizenship and any priest sent from Armenia to serve the church is likely
to be an Armenian citizen, so if the new law is adopted the priest would
not be eligible to lead the community. (END)
Copyright (c) 2002 Keston Institute. All rights reserved.
Subscribe to the free weekly KNS Summary, or to the almost daily
Keston News Service, through our website http://www.keston.org/. KNS
articles are posted on the website, as well as details of our other
publications: the bimonthly magazine Frontier and the quarterly
academic journal Religion, State & Society.
KNS may be reprinted or quoted providing acknowledgment is given,
such as "Source: Keston Institute http://www.keston.org".