Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

OCANews: "Three Questions for the Metropolitan"

Expand Messages
  • Nina Tkachuk Dimas
    02.01.07 Three Questions For The Metropolitan The Metropolitan, to his credit, has agreed to publicly answer questions regarding the scandal during a question
    Message 1 of 1 , Feb 1, 2007

      Three Questions For The Metropolitan

      The Metropolitan, to his credit, has agreed to publicly answer
      questions regarding the scandal during a question and answer session
      at St. Mark's parish in Bethesda, Maryland. If the questions being
      asked in the Comments section on this website are any indication,
      some of them will be hard, some are likely to be skeptical in tone,
      and others downright harsh. Such is the price of continuing silence
      in an atmosphere of distrust.

      And silence is the key word here, lest distrust overwhelm the
      process. After a flurry of timely and welcome postings during the
      historic joint meeting of the Synod of Bishops and the Metropolitan
      Council seven weeks ago, the OCA has released precious little
      additional information about anything substantial. Oh, there was
      time to let people know OCPC was
      suspending service for yearly inventory, pictures from a trip to
      Mexico by the Metropolitan, and of course, 75th birthday greetings.
      But at least three events of concern to everyone in the OCA have
      occurred without notice being given, without statements issued or
      without explanations offered. The Metropolitan's appearance would be
      a good time to ask "Why?"

      1. "Why have the Minutes of the Metropolitan Council meeting not
      been published yet?"

      The meeting was held December 11-13th. Council members received
      their copies before Christmas. It is now February. What is the delay
      with sharing the minutes of a most important meeting
      with the clergy and laity of the OCA whom the Council actually
      represents? It would be best if the MInutes came from the OCA.
      What's the problem?

      2. "Why have the internal auditors not issued any statement about
      their work yet?"

      The internal auditors of the OCA, composed of the V. Rev. Paul Suda,
      the V. Rev. David Mahaffey, Mr. David Donlick and Mr. Frank Tkacz
      after a two-year hiatus, met in Syosset at the end of December. Yet
      this meeting, too, was not announced, nor has any report been
      issued. Nothing. Although elected by the All-American Council, the
      internal auditors' total lack of fiduciary responsibility over the
      past 10 years cries out for the Metropolitan to accept their
      resignations, and for the Metropolitan Council
      in March (which is, according to Statute, the continuation of the
      All-American Council) to replace them before the next. Failing that,
      they should at very least not be afraid to state their findings
      publicly. That is whay they are there to do.

      3. And most importantly: "Why has the Independent Special Commission
      not issued any statement about their work yet? "

      The Independent Special Commission of the OCA, charged with
      completing the work begun by Proskauer Rose LLP, met last week in
      Parma OH. This was widely known in clerical circles in Cleveland.
      Now no one expects to hear anything about their investigation until
      they report to the Metropolitan Council in 40 days. Yet we have been
      given no information about their meeting schedule, plans, methods,
      procedures, or scope of their investigation. There are no good
      reasons to keep such things confidential. Indeed, the opposite
      is true. They are to be independent, not secret. Like Moses, this
      Commission was charged with going up the mountain. And unless the
      people hear something soon, the New Israel risks the same fate as
      the Old. "When the people became aware of Moses' delay in coming
      down from the mountain, they gathered around Aaron and said to
      him, 'Come, make us a god who will be our leader; as for the man
      Moses who brought us out of the land of Egypt, we do not know what
      has happened to him.'" (Exodus 32:1)

      These are the three questions I would ask in Bethesda. But the fact
      is, in an atmosphere of uncertainty and distrust, silence is a
      formula for disaster for the Independent Special Commission's
      credibility. It is even worse for the damaged credibility of the
      auditors who ignored the scandal for years. And most of all, it is
      damaging for the Metropolitan. Continuing the silence risks losing
      what little credibility he has gained since March 2006.

      The Church deserves to know.

      -Mark Stokoe
      © 2006 Orthodox Christians for Accountability — Orthodox Christians
      for Accountability is not affiliated with the Orthodox Church in
      America —-

      Finding fabulous fares is fun.
      Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel bargains.

      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.