Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

3911RE: Message not approved: Mutations in mammals

Expand Messages
  • Dave Oldridge
    Aug 8, 2013
    • 0 Attachment
      I already pointed this out before:


      Returns more than 590,000 hits. The first page lists several papers
      discussing these heritable mutations YOU say do not exist.

      Moreover, YOU have yet to supply any evidence whatever for YOUR claim.

      This makes you, since I already pointed this out to you both a liar and a
      hypocrite. Not only that, anyone actually reading your echo who KNOWS the
      science will KNOW that you are a liar without ever seeing me expose you.
      And if, like me, they try to post a refutation, they will no doubt get good
      evidence that you are also a hypocrite. You can lie to yourself about that
      if you like. That will only serve to postpone or prevent your repentance
      and will, therefore, continue to bar you from entrance into God's kingdom.
      But then you would rather go to hell than back down on even one of your
      (many lies. You either do not believe that part of scripture or you WANT
      that lake of fire. Which is it?

      From: Beetlebrain Troll [mailto:tinroad6g@...]
      Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 3:11 PM
      To: Dave Oldridge
      Subject: Re: Message not approved: Mutations in mammals

      translation-you have no evidence (as usual)--come back when you do have
      evidence dear boy

      From: Dave Oldridge <doldridg@...>
      To: 'tinroad6g' <tinroad6g@...>; Origins Uncensored
      Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2013 5:09 AM
      Subject: RE: Message not approved: Mutations in mammals

      While they are not, there is no record I can find of anything that prevents
      mutations in mammals from behaving the same way they do in insects. In
      short, your hypocritical post of unsupported garbage goes to prove that YOU
      do the same things in YOUR posts that you use as an excuse to reject mine.
      Jesus explicitly hates hypocrisy. You cannot bring that hypocrisy with you
      into God's kingdom and are, therefore, self-condemned to an eternity in that
      lake of fire spoken of in scripture! So the real question I have for you
      is: WHY do YOU want to go to hell? Not whether you do--that much is
      totally obvious to any objective observer. The question is WHY do you want
      it? The approval of some collection of nut-job heretics must be so
      important to you that you would rather face hell than their disapproval.

      Anyway, YOU did not support your claim. It is a false claim--to my direct
      knowledge. Darwin observed mutations in his pigeons (not mammals either,
      but vertebrates just the same). Dog breeders report that they can achieve
      just so much by combining existing alleles but then have to wait for
      mutations to make further progress in changing characteristics of their
      breeds. But they do report that those mutations eventually come along and
      that they are heritable. Serious geneticists KNOW that you are wrong and
      advancing such puerile arguments serves no purpose other than generating
      hostility towards your cause by PROVING that creationists are LIARS.

      However, as long as what you REALLY want is to prove to the unwary that
      Christians are liars, then your father, the devil, must be well pleased with
      your activities. I hope you realize that he hates your guts!

      > -----Original Message-----
      > From: notify@yahoogroups.com [mailto:notify@yahoogroups.com] On
      > Behalf Of tinroad6g
      > Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 9:53 PM
      > To: Dave Oldridge
      > Subject: Message not approved: Mutations in mammals
      > fruit flies are not mammals dave
      > > This is simply incorrect as is shown by Dobzhansky's experiment where
      > > he started with a monoclonal pair of fruit flies and was able to
      > > arrive, after just twenty generations at two distinct populations, one
      > > quite hairy, the other quite bald, that would not even voluntarily
      > interbreed.
      > >
      > > All the variation in this experiment had to from heritable mutations
      > > (due to the monoclonal nature of the original pair).
      > >
      > > Where did you get this piece of misinformation? Why are you repeating
      > > it after I already explained to you why it is wrong?
      > >
      > >
      > > > -----Original Message-----
      > > > From: DEBUNKINGEVOLUTIONISM@yahoogroups.com
      > > > [mailto:DEBUNKINGEVOLUTIONISM@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
      > > > tinroad6g
      > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 5:34 AM
      > > > To: DEBUNKINGEVOLUTIONISM@yahoogroups.com
      > > > Subject: [DEBUNKINGEVOLUTIONISM] Mutations in mammals
      > > >
      > > > When evolutionists claim a mutation that has been passed on to the
      > > > offspring investigation will show...
      > > >
      > > > 1. It is not a mutation at all
      > > > 2. The species has always been that way
      > > >
      > > > Mutations in mammals are NOT passed along to the offspring and
      > > > evolution is impossible.
      > > >
      > > > I used to believe in evolution until I studied it, became an expert
      > > > and is covered evolution is a complete and total hoax
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > ------------------------------------
      > > >
      > > > Question the assumptions of Evolution at
      > > > http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/qa.asp
      > > >
      > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >

      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    • Show all 3 messages in this topic