BL: Stanley, if you compare all the "belief systems"/religions you list in your post below -- if we assume that the believers take their respective religion
Is the fish really our ancestor?
mainstream evolutionary biologists' general commitment to materialism constrains the explanatory options available to them You’ve got it arse backwards.
This is evolution, not the Neo-Darwinism nonsense.
Jim in Missouri: More than that, Charles, if everything is reducible to matter and the laws of physics, we have no grounds for trusting anything our minds
Fetching Sponsored Content...
Think Islamists Are the Only Religious Terrorists?
It is a rebuttal. It is the explanation I give you as to why I reasonably dismiss your opinions on Islam. Response: I would think the actual quotations from
Very advanced state-of-the-art molecular science!
... From: 'Stewart' firstname.lastname@example.org [OriginsTalk] To: OriginsTalk@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 10:35 AM Subject: Re: [OriginsTalk] Very
Oklahoma's 2015 Creationism Bill -- It's Dead
... From: email@example.com [OriginsTalk] To: OriginsTalk@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 8:36 AM Subject: Re: [OriginsTalk] Re: Oklahoma's
Why DO conservatives hate science so much?
No. What you described is a physical thing while maintaining that it is immaterial. As soon as you use terminology that describes material it’s an oxymoron.
The RNA World
DRL: You pretend to know more about what I think and don't think, what I know and what I don't know, what I do and what I don't do, what I've read and what I
The Elephant in the Room
... From: 'Stewart' firstname.lastname@example.org [OriginsTalk] To: OriginsTalk@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 12:34 PM Subject: Re: [OriginsTalk]
Neo-Darwinism's Long History of Inaccurate Predictions about Junk Or
DRL: "By the way, how do you explain intermediate fossils if they are not transitional?" Jim in Missouri: They could be mosaics utilizing common design
The "ID hypothesis" is that certain features in nature are best explained by intelligent causation, not by any unintelligent natural (or material) processes.
Mom prays, dead son comes back to life
Response: I didn't want to tell you this, but you've been there for quite a while already. I get the feeling that’s true every time I read your posts.
From Will Brooks Wednesday 11th February PM GMT In response to Bjorn My latest comments will be identified : (11) I cannot but help from LOL given that what
Molecular Biology has Failed to Yield a Grand "Tree of Life"
From the article: When fossils failed to demonstrate that animals evolved from a common ancestor, DRL: I'd like to see evidence of this (other than in the
Sulfur Bacteria, Unchanged for Billions of Years, Confirm Darwinian
LA> The above is quite irrelevant, since it was on blah blah blah blah. “The creationist is a sham religious person who, curiously, has no true sense of
Fetching Sponsored Content...
View First Topic Go to
Loading 1 - 15 of total 15 topics