http://www.godsriddle.info/2013/07/testing-mathematics.html

<http://www.godsriddle.info/2013/07/testing-mathematics.html>

"Mathematics is used to test the validity of observations."

"... observations, are highly subjective and are often proven wrong

after better measurement techniques are discovered."

There is not a single mathematical formula in the Bible. The fundamental

theorem of algebra was invented by Muslim scholars long after the

apostles died. (The Greeks used geometry, not formulas, in their

science). The anti-bible crowd points out that the ratio pi is wrong in

1 Kings 7:23. The word circumference is a verb in this text. They were

walking around the bronze sea - elbowing around it - not calculating a

mathematical ratio. They could cast a bronze sea without the need for

the ratio pi by building a clay mold with a central peg and a rope.

With a moveable sighting marker on a rope, a central sitting pole, four

solstice poles on a large circle (to which the rope was attached at

sunrise and sunset) and a leveled sighting bank beyond the circle

(British henges), the ancients could predict eclipses without using

mathematical formulas. We forget the simplicity of the ancient ways

because we only know mathematical methods.

Picture of Solomon's bronze sea is here:

http://www.godsriddle.info/2013/07/failure-of-mathematics.html

<http://www.godsriddle.info/2013/07/failure-of-mathematics.html>

Numbers and formulas are only symbols, they have no actual reality. They

exist only in minds. So how can symbols seemingly fit mathematical

reality? They ONLY FIT the symbolical reality, and then only locally.

They do not fit the real visible history of the cosmos or the

astronomical accounts and earth histories of our ancestors. This is why

the mathematical universe is mythical, crammed full of undetectable,

magical things. The "scientific" claim that 80 % of the matter

in the universe is invisible is based on a mathematical, symbolical

version of reality that has no counterpart in visible nature, either

locally or in the distance.

Mathematical science defines reality with an elementary assumption that

must be accepted by an unsupported and unshakable faith. What sort of

faith supports western empirical science? The historical assumption upon

which mathematical, empirical science was contrived was predicted in the

Bible. Peter prophesied that mockers will come claiming "all things

remain the same."

The problem is that mathematical reality is defined operationally. Take

the fundamental measuring unit for empirical science, the second of

time. No one has detected any time. Solomon claimed that long-time

(Hebrew olam, Greek and English eons) is in our minds, which is why we

cannot understand all that God has done from beginning to end. Newton

and Einstein assumed that time is what clocks measure. You must believe

that matter has a fixed essence, an unchanging nature, to invent an

operation definition such as: 9,192,631,770 oscillations from cesium 133

is a fixed duration second. An operational definition is not concerned

with whether time actually exists. It simply defines it and goes about

mathematically manipulating it as though it were real. If atoms were

changing themselves internally, all atomic clocks would keep tuning

themselves to the changing atoms. Atomic clocks are really two clocks -

the input and output clock. The input clock is tuned via a feedback

circuit for a maximum signal strength for the output clock. Scientists

simply assume the basic metaphysics of the western system, define

seconds mathematically and invent meters, velocities, laws and constants

all based on the basic assumption of westernism, an idea fabricated by

Catholic medieval scholars.

Yet when we compare an atomic clock with its transponded reflections

from hours ago (Pioneer Anomaly) atomic clocks keep on changing speed

just like all light clocks do in hundreds of billions of ancient

galaxies, at many ranges. Our mathematics works with great precision,

says the scientist. It only works locally because scientists define

physical reality with symbols that depend for their existence on the

basic creed, the notion that atoms are perpetual motion engines. The

fundamental definitions, the measuring units, the mathematical constants

and laws, the entire structure of mathematical science exists in the

symbolical realm, a realm that has no counterpart in the visible world

of nature or in the ancient light that reveals cosmic history.

This is why the Bible states that light refutes error by exposing it.

Light supports and reveals the truth because all that is visible is

light, phos estin (Ephesians 5:13). Matter is a relation with light. The

Earth had no extension until God's wind continued (in unbroken

continuity) to dither as He continually commanded light to continue to

be. Light is the fundamental definer of reality, not mathematics. All

physical reality involves light. This is why matter has non local and

dualistic properties because everything that exists involves a relation

with light.

Changing Earth Creationists accept cosmic history as we see it in all

parts of the light spectrum. It is in galactic history that we see the

simple evidence for a literal (rather than the traditional Latinized )

creation. The light from the creation era shows that everything changes

relationally. We observe how the orbits accelerate along with the atomic

clocks as billions of galaxies grew out of their unformed origins. The

stars continue to form and spread out, as stated in the literal Hebrew

of the creation account and the several other biblical texts that refer

to earth and cosmic history. We see that the universe has vast age, as

the Bible plainly states, yet the genealogical records show that our

planet has only orbited the Sun about 6,000 times. The orbits

continually accelerate outward along with the accelerating atomic and

inertial clocks as billions of galaxies grew into huge growth spirals.

I recommend that creationists spend a few hours examining the images and

spectra of ancient galaxies at many ranges. It is there that we see

God's great glory. We see creation as spelled out in the literal

text and we see how completely the Word of God will triumph over

science. How? The fundamental assumption upon which mathematical science

was contrived is visibly false. Look and glorify the wisdom of the

creator who can make foolish the wise of this age even using their

mathematical skills to defeat them. Look!

Victor, Changing Earth Creationist

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]