Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Mitochondrial Eve was 6,000 years old?

Expand Messages
  • Charles Palm
    Ann Gibbons: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/279/5347/28.summary?sid=82c3a902-2754-49f5-833b-d798cb425e9a DNA studies of the remains of the last Russian
    Message 1 of 1 , Jan 20, 2013
    • 0 Attachment
      Ann Gibbons:
      http://www.sciencemag.org/content/279/5347/28.summary?sid=82c3a902-2754-49f5-833b-d798cb425e9a
      DNA studies of the remains of the last Russian tsar, Nicholas II
      illustrate troubling questions in forensics and the dating of evolutionary
      events. The Tsar inherited two different sequences of mitochondrial DNA
      (mtDNA) from their mother, a condition known as heteroplasmy that was
      previously considered rare but which new studies show may occur in at least
      10% and probably 20% of all humans. This may mean that mtDNA mutates
      perhaps as much as 20-fold faster than expected, according to two
      controversial studies. Since evolutionists had assumed that mtDNA mutations
      occur at a steady rate, these studies cast doubt over the dating of such
      events as the peopling of Europe. The new results are already prompting
      changes in DNA forensics procedures.

      Ann Gibbons: http://www.dnai.org/teacherguide/pdf/reference_romanovs.pdf
      Regardless of the cause, evolutionists are most concerned about the
      effect
      of a faster mutation rate. For example, researchers have calculated that
      "mitochondrial Eve"--the woman whose mtDNA was ancestral to that in all
      living people--lived 100,000 to 200,000 years ago in Africa. Using the
      new clock, she would be a mere 6000 years old.

      Charles P: Here is the dilemma for the *anti-creationists*:

      1 If Ann Gibbons is a creationist, then creationists are scientists of the
      same status as other scientists. Creationists have their research
      published in scientific journals. The oldest human ancestors are 6,000
      years old and supports human genealogy as calculated by Biblical scholars.

      2 If Ann Gibbons is not a creationist, then the age of 6,000 must be
      *wrong* and a new strategy must be invented to get the *right* answer.
      *Anti-creationists* must change their data to fit the old Theory of
      Evolution.

      ***********************************************

      http://creationresearch.org/vacrc/iDino_research.html The Society has
      launched a research initiative to study soft tissue found in dinosaur
      fossils, which are claimed to be millions of years old. In 2005, work was
      published showing evidence that non-fossilized tissue (e.g., red blood
      cells, bone cells, etc.) was found within the fossilized remains of a
      Tyrannosaurus rex dinosaur. Since these fossils have been traditionally
      dated at ages greater than 65 million years, such findings directly
      challenge the entire evolutionary “millions of year” timeframe.

      Dr. Kevin Anderson:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YM-yJ-uTD7o&feature=em-uploademail Time
      16:33 Dr. Mary Schweitzer found DNA in a hadrosaur bone.

      Dinosaur Soft Tissue is Original Biological Material:
      http://kgov.com/dinosaur-soft-tissue NOVEMBER 2012 UPDATE: Historic DNA
      Discovery! Dr. Schweitzer's new paper, peer-reviewed and approved for
      publication but not yet published, documents the presence of four proteins
      in dinosaur fossils and the presence of dinosaur DNA.

      Charles P: Why is this important? The presence of four proteins in
      dinosaur fossils and the presence of dinosaur DNA suggests that these
      dinosaurs died thousands of years ago, not millions of years ago.


      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.